Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal vs Tom Gentzsch Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Baal vs Gentzsch analysis and find out who is favored!
Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal vs Tom Gentzsch Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Baal has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Gentzsch has won 48.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Baal, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gentzsch has won 50.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30.5% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Baal has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gentzsch has saved 59.2% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Baal has won 44.44% of matches played (W/L 4/ 5), with Gentzsch winning 57.83% (W/L 48/ 35) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Baal has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 13/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Gentzsch has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 52/ 43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 10/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Baal has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 4/ 5), where as Gentzsch has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.46% of matches (W/L 44/ 30). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Baal winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Baal winning 1 and Gentzsch winning 2. The last match between Baal and Gentzsch was at the M15 Skopje, 30-05-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Tom Gentzsch getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Baal and Gentzsch have played a deciding set 1 times, with Baal winning 0 times and Gentzsch 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Baal winning 0, and Gentzsch 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Baal has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Gentzsch has played against players with an average rank of 153.98.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Baal has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gentzsch has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Baal has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gentzsch has converted 41.34% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Baal 0 - 1 Gentzsch
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
547
Rank
544
High
20
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
45% (37-45)
Career Total W/L
54% (101-86)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
58% (11-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal | Tom Gentzsch |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 15 | 21 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 5-7 10-7 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal | Tom Gentzsch |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (24/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (221/214) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.68 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 145 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 66 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:37:48 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 127.32 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 66% (888/1349) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 72% (641/888) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (230/461) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 45% (47/104) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (520/1381) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (11/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (12/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (12/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 14% (7/1) |
Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats 
Mayeul Darras
Player
Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal
Player
Benjamin Zuniga Garcia
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brian Bozemoj
Player
Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
Player
Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 5-7 17-15 | H2H | |||
view more
Tom Gentzsch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Tom Gentzsch
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
2
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Tom Gentzsch
48%
(
37 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
61 of
89)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
46 of
61)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Weintraub
Player
Tom Gentzsch
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
9
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Tom Gentzsch
70%
(
65 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Jorge Martinez Martinez
73%
(
60 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Darwin Blanch
70%
(
61 of
87)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Tom Gentzsch
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
6
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
0
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Yannik Steinegger
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Lasse Poertner
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
71%
(
52 of
73)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tom Gentzsch
Player
Justin Engel
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Baal Vs Gentzsch Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
