Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal vs Tim Handel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Baal vs Handel analysis and find out who is favored!
Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal vs Tim Handel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Baal has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Handel has won 50.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Baal, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Handel has won 48.28%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Baal has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Handel has saved 67.77% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Baal has won 44.44% of matches played (W/L 4/ 5), with Handel winning 64.29% (W/L 54/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Baal has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 13/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Handel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 113/ 60), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 13/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Baal has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 4/ 5), where as Handel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.01% of matches (W/L 49/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Baal winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Baal winning 0 and Handel winning 2. The last match between Baal and Handel was at the M15 Monastir, 09-03-2020, Q2 round, Hard with Tim Handel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Baal and Handel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Baal winning 0 times and Handel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Baal winning 0, and Handel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Baal has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Handel has played against players with an average rank of 226.01.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Baal has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Handel has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Baal has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Handel has converted 40.17% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Baal 0 - 1 Handel
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
364
Rank
364
High
27
Age
Plays
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Form
45% (37-45)
Career Total W/L
60% (162-106)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
60% (9-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal | Tim Handel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 2 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal | Tim Handel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (9/6) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (19/14) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (168/159) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.38 |
Aces Total | 0 | 60 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.33 |
DFs Total | 0 | 52 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:45:48 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 96.47 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 60% (645/1077) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (461/645) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (212/432) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 39% (38/97) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (410/1071) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/3) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (9/15) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 88% (8/7) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 13% (8/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 29% (7/2) |
Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 5-7 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Mayeul Darras
Player
Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal
Player
Benjamin Zuniga Garcia
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Brian Bozemoj
Player
Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ivan Marrero Curbelo
Player
Aloys Johannes Willem Van Baal
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 5-7 17-15 | H2H |
view more
Tim Handel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Tim Handel
Player
Samuel Brosset
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
62 of
114)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
29%
(
24 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
114)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tim Handel
Player
Tristan Berard
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
19 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
SF |
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Tim Handel
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tim Handel
Player
Nino Serdarusic
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tim Handel
Player
Emilien Voisin
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tim Handel
Player
Louroi Martinez
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Tim Handel
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tim Handel
Player
Mika Lipp
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Tim Handel
64%
(
71 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
23
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
35 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Andre Ilagan
Player
Tim Handel
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more