Alona Bondarenko vs Sara Errani Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W L L W L L
Form
L L L W L L L L W LHead-2-Head: Bondarenko 1 - 0 Errani
They have played 2 sets in total, with Bondarenko winning 2 and Errani winning 0. The last match between Bondarenko and Errani was at the China Open - Beijing, 05-10-2009, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Alona Bondarenko getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Alona Bondarenko | 1 |
| Sara Errani | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: China Open - Beijing(05-10-2009)
Alona Bondarenko
Sara Errani
6
3
6
3
| Bondarenko | Stats | Errani |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 25% (3-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 285 |
| 19 | Highest Rank | 5 |
| 40 | Age | 38 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 16 |
| 53% (301-263) | Career Total W/L | 57% (650-490) |
| $1,286,785 | Career Prize Money | $7,709,160 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Fonseca PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
25 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Garin VS Habib PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bondarenko VS Errani H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Alona Bondarenko
Player
Sara Errani
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
81%
(
55 of
68)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
Bondarenko VS Errani H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 70% (46/66) | 1st Serve % | 81% (55/68) |
| 67% (31/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 45% (25/55) |
| 45% (9/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (6/13) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (2/10) |
| 54% (37/68) | Return Points Win % | 39% (26/66) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Alona Bondarenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kayla Day
Player
Alona Bondarenko
46%
(
19 of
41)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
18 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Duval
Player
Alona Bondarenko
72%
(
72 of
100)
1st Serve %
63%
(
62 of
98)
0
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
3
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
49%
(
49 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
50 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Sara Errani Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sara Errani
65%
(
68 of
104)
1st Serve %
88%
(
73 of
83)
4
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
3
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
43 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-0 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Jule Niemeier
81%
(
70 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
11
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
0-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Sara Errani
46%
(
22 of
48)
1st Serve %
82%
(
53 of
65)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Sara Errani
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
79)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Magdalena Frech
Player
Sara Errani
64%
(
76 of
119)
1st Serve %
83%
(
99 of
120)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
57 of
99)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
48 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
50 of
120)
121
Total Points Won
118
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Kudermetova
Player
Sara Errani
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
75%
(
43 of
57)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
1
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maya Joint
Player
Sara Errani
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
79%
(
72 of
91)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(6) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53% (301/263) | Win/Loss | 57% (650/490) |
| 52% (682/640) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (1444/1161) |
| 51% (6072/5945) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (12376/11391) |
| 51% (109/105) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (239/201) |
| 57% (129/99) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (347/208) |
| 51% (41/40) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (40/46) |
| 54% (22/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 41% (24/35) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 239 | Aces Total | 202 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 723 | Total Double Faults | 2020 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:9:35 |
| 487.91 | Average Opponent Rank | 434.98 |
| 69% (13343/19455) | 1st Serve % | 78% (52437/67609) |
| 58% (7763/13344) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (29112/52437) |
| 46% (2813/6114) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (6459/15169) |
| 48% (1170/2423) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (4843/9569) |
| 45% (8860/19488) | Return Points Win % | 49% (33145/67719) |
| 48% (32/35) | Slam W/L | 56% (83/66) |
| 50% (48/48) | Masters W/L | 47% (97/111) |
| 60% (9/6) | Cups W/L | 50% (16/16) |
| 53% (118/105) | Main Tour W/L | 60% (292/197) |
| 58% (80/59) | Challenger W/L | 61% (157/100) |
| 58% (14/10) | Futures W/L | 100% (5/0) |
| 53% (297/559) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (635/1122) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 83% (5/6) |
| 52% (51/98) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (136/245) |
| 57% (113/199) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (178/335) |
| 85% (277/236) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (633/550) |
| 15% (277/41) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (633/83) |
| 22% (286/63) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (505/95) |
Bondarenko vs. Errani Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
