Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Allie Kiick vs Katie Codd Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kiick vs Codd analysis and find out who is favored!
Allie Kiick vs Katie Codd Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kiick has won 42.31% of points on his second serve, while Codd has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kiick, in recent form, has won 54.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Codd has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.07% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kiick has saved 49.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Codd has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kiick has won 67.5% of matches played (W/L 27/ 13), with Codd winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kiick has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 139/ 83), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4). Codd has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 7/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 29% (W/L 5/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Kiick has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.5% of matches (W/L 27/ 13), where as Codd has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 2/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kiick has played against opponents with an average rank of 221.93 while Codd has played against players with an average rank of 116.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kiick has won 78% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Codd has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kiick has converted 53.93% of breakpoint opportunities, and Codd has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kiick 0 - 0 Codd
331
Rank
126
High
28
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
59% (269-187)
Career Total W/L
41% (12-17)
57% (4-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$189,745
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Allie Kiick | Katie Codd |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (71/69) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 19 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 18 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:8 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 249.29 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (297/463) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (177/297) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (74/166) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (30/55) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (209/448) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Allie Kiick Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Allie Kiick
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Kozyreva
Player
Allie Kiick
63%
(
70 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
1
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
4
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
47%
(
52 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
96
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Clervie Ngounoue
Player
Allie Kiick
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Allie Kiick
Player
Angella Okutoyi
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Allie Kiick
Player
Marie Benoit
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
50%
(
37 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
68
|
0-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Allie Kiick
Player
Maria Kononova
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Allie Kiick
Player
Irina Ramialison
74%
(
74 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
97
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Grace Min
Player
Allie Kiick
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
15
46%
(
19 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
13 of
42)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
52%
(
36 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
51 of
89)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Allie Kiick
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Allie Kiick
Player
Alana Smith
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Katie Codd Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Layne Sleeth
Player
Katie Codd
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Nguyen
Player
Katie Codd
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
1
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rhiann Newborn
Player
Katie Codd
41%
(
14 of
34)
1st Serve %
61%
(
22 of
36)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
10 of
14)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
11 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
39
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Samantha Crawford
Player
Katie Codd
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
21 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Codd
Player
Jordyn Mcbride
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rhiann Newborn
Player
Katie Codd
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
66 of
113)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
49 of
113)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
1-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Codd
Player
Gina Kondos
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Katie Codd
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
47%
(
23 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Codd
Player
Basant Kaur
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
19 of
34)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katie Codd
Player
Piper Charney
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
47%
(
38 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 1-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Kiick Vs Codd Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
