Prediction of Aliona Bolsova [405th] vs Julia Grabher [294th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W L L W L
Form
W W W W W W W W W WHead-To-Head: Bolsova 1 - 2 Grabher
They have played 7 sets in total, with Bolsova winning 2 and Grabher winning 5. The last match between Bolsova and Grabher was at the W50 Spring, 18-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Aliona Bolsova getting the victory 6-2 6-7(4) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Aliona Bolsova | 1 |
| Julia Grabher | 2 |
| Bolsova | Stats | Grabher |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (14-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 62% (13-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 405 | Ranking | 294 |
| 88 | Highest Rank | 54 |
| 27 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 15 |
| 61% (286-184) | Career Total W/L | 60% (377-253) |
| $811,833 | Career Prize Money | $402,254 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 2 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 |
Stats 
Aliona Bolsova
Player
Julia Grabher
73%
(
74 of
101)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
42 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
97
|
||||
| 6-3 7-6(3) |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Aliona Bolsova
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Aliona Bolsova
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 32 | Games Won | 37 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
| 1:42:22 | Average Match Time | 1:42:22 |
| 72% (163/227) | 1st Serve % | 65% (149/228) |
| 56% (91/163) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (93/149) |
| 48% (31/64) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (38/79) |
| 42% (11/26) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (13/27) |
| 43% (97/228) | Return Points Win % | 46% (105/227) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Aliona Bolsova vs Julia Grabher Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bolsova 1 - 2 Grabher
Editorial Prediction:
- Predicting performance based on recent second serve statistics: Bolsova and Grabher have displayed a remarkable level of skill in their second serve performance over the past six months. Bolsova has achieved an impressive 45.52% success rate on her second serve, while Grabher, not far behind, has secured a 43.78% success rate. It is worth noting that there is a notable correlation between the second serve performance and the accuracy of match predictions.
- Insights from return game stats: Analyzing the return game statistics of Bolsova and Grabher in recent matches reveals intriguing findings. Bolsova has demonstrated her prowess by triumphing in 54.88% of her opponents' second serve points, while Grabher has impressively emerged victorious in 55.95% of these points. The first serve return statistics further shed light on the forthcoming match, with Bolsova achieving a 46.8% success rate and Grabher boasting a 41.05% success rate. These figures serve as valuable indicators in determining the favored player in this highly-anticipated head-to-head clash.
- Under pressure: Breakpoint analysis: When assessing the ability to handle pressure, Bolsova and Grabher have showcased commendable skills in saving breakpoints in recent matches. Bolsova has managed to save 52.81% of breakpoints she faced, while Grabher has demonstrated an incredible 59.22% success rate in this regard. Such statistics prove to be invaluable for those engaging in in-game betting predictions.
- Evaluating overall performance: Examining the performances of Bolsova and Grabher over the past year, Bolsova has emerged victorious in 55.17% of her matches (with a win-loss record of 16 wins and 13 losses), while Grabher has achieved a win rate of 48.89% (with a win-loss record of 22 wins and 23 losses). These figures provide us with an overview of their head-to-head predictions and set the stage for an intriguing faceoff.
- Unveiling the dominance on different surfaces: Bolsova and Grabher's performances on various surfaces uncover interesting patterns. Bolsova excels on clay courts, boasting an impressive 65% career win rate (with a win-loss record of 195 wins and 104 losses). Conversely, her performance on grass courts has been relatively weaker, with a win rate of 33% (with a win-loss record of 3 wins and 6 losses). Grabher, similarly, dominates on clay courts with a win rate of 64% (with a win-loss record of 317 wins and 179 losses), while struggling on grass courts with a win rate of 20% (with a win-loss record of 1 win and 4 losses).
- Assessing player level and event context: In the past year, Bolsova has primarily competed in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000. During these tournaments, she achieved an impressive 59.26% win rate (with a win-loss record of 16 wins and 11 losses). Conversely, Grabher also participated in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000, demonstrating her skills by winning 60% of her matches (with a win-loss record of 21 wins and 14 losses). When predicting the favored player based on these statistics, it is important to consider the level of the events they have been competing in.
- Previous face-offs: Bolsova and Grabher have crossed paths on two occasions. Regrettably for Bolsova, she has yet to secure a victory against Grabher, who emerged triumphant in both encounters. Across these matches, Grabher dominated by winning all four sets played. The most recent encounter between these formidable opponents occurred in the W60 San Sebastian tournament on February 10, 2022, yielding a hard-fought victory for Julia Grabher, with a score of 6-3 7-6(3).
- Taking note of match duration: Previous matches between Bolsova and Grabher suggest that their encounters tend to be efficient and decisive. On average, these players have completed their matches in just under one hour and twenty-three minutes.
- Decoding the outcome of deciding sets: Bolsova and Grabher have engaged in nail-biting deciding sets on zero occasions in the past, leaving the outcome of such scenarios uncertain. While Bolsova has not emerged victorious in any deciding sets against Grabher, Grabher herself has yet to claim a win in this situation. Understanding how each player performs under such pressure can be influential in predicting the ultimate outcome if the match extends to a deciding set.
- Exploring head-to-head pressure situations: In the history of their encounters, Bolsova and Grabher have competed in a single tiebreak, with Grabher emerging victorious on that occasion. This statistic provides valuable insights into how these players handle extreme pressure situations against each other.
- Assessing opponent quality: Reviewing the opponents faced by Bolsova and Grabher over the past twelve months sheds light on their respective levels of competition. Bolsova's opponents boasted an average ranking of 236.79, showcasing her ability to challenge formidable players. In contrast, Grabher's opponents maintained an average ranking of 332.58, indicating the caliber of competition she has faced.
- Decisive set performance: For those interested in live predictions and betting opportunities, it is crucial to consider how Bolsova and Grabher perform in deciding sets. Bolsova has achieved an impressive 60% success rate in deciding sets over the past twelve months, displaying her ability to triumph in high-stakes scenarios. Meanwhile, Grabher boasts a 55% success rate in all matches played on tour, indicating her consistent performance when the outcome hangs in the balance.
- Focusing on current event statistics: While past player performances provide valuable insights, it is equally important to examine current event statistics to gauge a player's form. The section below offers a comprehensive analysis of the players' performances in the ongoing event. Additionally, it is essential to acknowledge that certain players thrive in specific events, and these factors must be taken into account when predicting the match outcome.
- Breakpoint conversion: A crucial statistic for live betting: Evaluating recent form, Bolsova and Grabher have shown proficiency in converting break point opportunities. Bolsova has capitalized on 52.36% of her breakpoint chances, while Grabher has similarly demonstrated her prowess by successfully converting 51.23% of her break point opportunities. These statistics prove indispensable for those seeking in-game betting strategies when players find themselves on the brink of breaking their opponent's serve.
- If you are eager to explore models that predict tennis match outcomes, the following article serves as an excellent starting point. However, it should be noted that it caters primarily to avid statistics enthusiasts.
Aliona Bolsova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Aliona Bolsova
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
83%
(
48 of
58)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
58
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aliona Bolsova
Player
Tena Lukas
76%
(
68 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
24%
(
5 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
41 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-0 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Aliona Bolsova
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Aliona Bolsova
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
81%
(
94 of
116)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
43%
(
10 of
23)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
48%
(
42 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
63 of
116)
108
Total Points Won
95
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aliona Bolsova
Player
Caroline Werner
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
49%
(
27 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aliona Bolsova
Player
Arantxa Rus
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aliona Bolsova
Player
Nao Hibino
86%
(
56 of
65)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lilli Tagger
Player
Aliona Bolsova
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve %
82%
(
40 of
49)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
6 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
50
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aliona Bolsova
Player
Georgia Pedone
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Julia Grabher Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Arantxa Rus
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Petra Marcinko
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Ekaterina Maklakova
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Sapfo Sakellaridi
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
51
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Emily Seibold
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Marcelina Podlinska
87%
(
39 of
45)
1st Serve %
72%
(
31 of
43)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Jessica Pieri
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
79%
(
41 of
52)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Despina Papamichail
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Ikumi Yamazaki
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Ksenia Efremova
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve %
36%
(
12 of
33)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
13
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
15 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
48
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (286/184) | Win/Loss | 60% (377/253) |
| 58% (629/452) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (834/594) |
| 54% (5261/4476) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (6957/5961) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 539 | Aces Total | 661 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 746 | Total Double Faults | 2405 |
| 1:13:27 | Average Match Time | 1:22:7 |
| 444.44 | Average Opponent Rank | 478.56 |
| 70% (16665/23721) | 1st Serve % | 64% (22866/35453) |
| 60% (9945/16665) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (14207/22866) |
| 46% (3236/7055) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (5578/12585) |
| 48% (1481/3098) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2292/4665) |
| 47% (11144/23936) | Return Points Win % | 47% (16905/36005) |
| 61% (283/465) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (371/618) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 41% (39/94) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (61/125) |
| 59% (86/145) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (93/174) |
| 87% (274/238) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (367/327) |
| 13% (274/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (367/39) |
| 25% (195/48) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (263/52) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
