Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Aline Thommen vs Tamara Racine-beauchamp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Thommen vs Racine-beauchamp analysis and find out who is favored!
Aline Thommen vs Tamara Racine-beauchamp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Thommen has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Racine-beauchamp has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Thommen, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Racine-beauchamp has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Thommen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Racine-beauchamp has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Thommen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Racine-beauchamp winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Thommen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 16/ 39), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Racine-beauchamp has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Thommen has played against opponents with an average rank of while Racine-beauchamp has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Thommen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Racine-beauchamp has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Thommen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Racine-beauchamp has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Thommen 0 - 0 Racine-beauchamp
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Thommen VS Racine-beauchamp H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Aline Thommen | Tamara Racine-beauchamp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aline Thommen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Enola Chiesa
Player
Aline Thommen
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
50%
(
18 of
36)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
22%
(
2 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
47%
(
15 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
40
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aline Thommen
Player
Brittany Collens
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
13 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
45
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joanna Zawadzka
Player
Aline Thommen
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
51%
(
28 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sabina Dadaciu
Player
Aline Thommen
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
89%
(
8 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
50%
(
33 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chelsea Vanhoutte
Player
Aline Thommen
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
80%
(
45 of
56)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Barbora Matusova
Player
Aline Thommen
52%
(
55 of
106)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
99)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
53%
(
27 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
44 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Tamara Racine-beauchamp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 5-7 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-7(6) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Haruna Arakawa
Player
Tamara Racine-Beauchamp
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
50%
(
23 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
42 of
70)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Cemre Anil
Player
Tamara Racine-Beauchamp
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
50%
(
25 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Thommen Vs Racine-beauchamp Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
