Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alina Charaeva vs Matilde Paoletti Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Charaeva vs Paoletti analysis and find out who is favored!
Alina Charaeva vs Matilde Paoletti Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Charaeva has won 45.63% of points on his second serve, while Paoletti has won 32.35%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Charaeva, in recent form, has won 62.15% of his opponent's second serve points, while Paoletti has won 53.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.34% and 42.14% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Charaeva has saved 58.36% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paoletti has saved 34.62% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Charaeva has won 67.69% of matches played (W/L 44/ 21), with Paoletti winning 58.33% (W/L 7/ 5) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Charaeva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 44/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 22/ 13). Paoletti has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 40/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Charaeva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.69% of matches (W/L 44/ 21), where as Paoletti has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 7/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Charaeva has played against opponents with an average rank of 288.15 while Paoletti has played against players with an average rank of 266.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Charaeva has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paoletti has won 71% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Charaeva has converted 52.03% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paoletti has converted 45.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Charaeva 0 - 0 Paoletti
306
Rank
304
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
625
Rank
262
High
21
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
66% (119-60)
Career Total W/L
57% (43-33)
64% (7-4)
YTD W/L
75% (3-1)
$5,000
Career Prize Money
$5,265
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alina Charaeva | Matilde Paoletti |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (7/4) | 75% (3/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (15/12) | 64% (7/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (139/114) | 53% (56/49) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.02 |
| Aces Total | 47 | 1 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 17 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:38 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 433.18 | 220.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (497/872) | 69% (150/218) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (325/497) | 56% (84/150) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (165/375) | 32% (22/68) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (58/120) | 46% (16/35) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (408/843) | 47% (107/229) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (7/4) | 75% (3/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (7/11) | 75% (3/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Alina Charaeva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Manon Leonard
Player
Alina Charaeva
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
55%
(
66 of
121)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
106)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
11
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
47%
(
26 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
16 of
46)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
54 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
106)
120
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(6) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Alina Charaeva
47%
(
32 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
4
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
8
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Polina Iatcenko
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
7
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
2
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Alina Charaeva
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marina Bassols Ribera
Player
Alina Charaeva
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
51%
(
53 of
103)
0
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
32%
(
12 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Lena Couto
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Julia Avdeeva
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
48 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Matilde Paoletti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Lina Gjorcheska
Player
Matilde Paoletti
71%
(
60 of
85)
1st Serve %
75%
(
77 of
103)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Selena Janicijevic
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
48 of
89)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Anca Alexia Todoni
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
38%
(
10 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
67%
(
29 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
43
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 0-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jennifer Ruggeri
Player
Matilde Paoletti
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
85%
(
35 of
41)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Deborah Chiesa
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Nuria Brancaccio
80%
(
63 of
79)
1st Serve %
75%
(
53 of
71)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Matilde Paoletti
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
100%
(
23 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Nuria Brancaccio
67%
(
72 of
107)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
42%
(
45 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
100
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matilde Paoletti
Player
Jule Niemeier
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
49%
(
44 of
89)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
12
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Charaeva Vs Paoletti Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
