Alina Charaeva vs Dalila Spiteri Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W W L W L
Form
L W W W W L W W W LHead-To-Head: Charaeva 1 - 0 Spiteri
They have played 3 sets in total, with Charaeva winning 2 and Spiteri winning 1. The last match between Charaeva and Spiteri was at the W100 Zaragoza, 08-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Alina Charaeva getting the victory 3-6 7-6(1) 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Alina Charaeva | 1 |
| Dalila Spiteri | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W100 Zaragoza(08-04-2025)
Alina Charaeva
Dalila Spiteri
3
6
7
6
6
0
| Charaeva | Stats | Spiteri |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (13-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (11-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 253 | Ranking | 507 |
| 197 | Highest Rank | 305 |
| 22 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 7 | Titles | 3 |
| 64% (163-92) | Career Total W/L | 58% (281-206) |
| $5,000 | Career Prize Money | $4,274 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Duckworth VS Bertola PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
17 May 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Norrie VS Kirkin PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
17 May 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-6(1) 6-0 |
Stats 
Alina Charaeva
Player
Dalila Spiteri
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 12 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 2:24:25 | Average Match Time | 2:24:25 |
| 54% (36/67) | 1st Serve % | 66% (62/94) |
| 72% (26/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (34/62) |
| 39% (12/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (16/32) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 80% (4/5) |
| 47% (44/94) | Return Points Win % | 43% (29/67) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Charaeva vs Spiteri Match Preview :
The comparison between Charaeva and Spiteri reveals several intriguing statistics that can aid in predicting the outcome of their upcoming tennis match. In recent months, Charaeva's performance on the second serve has seen her winning 35.94% of points, whereas Spiteri has a slightly better record at 38.76%. The success rate in winning points on the opponent's second serve shows Charaeva at 50.13% and Spiteri at 48.39%, factors which are closely tied with accurate match predictions.
Examining return game stats, Charaeva has a higher winning percentage on first serve returns at 35.53%, compared to Spiteri’s 31.66%. This statistic is significant in determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup. Furthermore, when facing breakpoints, Spiteri has saved 50.67% compared to Charaeva’s 45.82%, a crucial stat for in-game betting considerations.
Over the past year, Charaeva has demonstrated a 57.14% win rate in her matches, with a record of 36 wins and 27 losses, indicating a potentially stronger form than Spiteri, who has a 48.57% win rate with 17 wins and 18 losses. Considering the playing surfaces, Charaeva has an impressive 67% win percentage on Hard courts, with her weakest being Indoor Hard at 59%. Similarly, Spiteri excels on Indoor Hard courts at 59%, but relatively underperforms on Hard courts at a 57% win rate.
The two players have primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments above $10K. Charaeva managed a 57.14% win rate in these events, while Spiteri achieved a 51.72% win rate. Additionally, Charaeva has faced tougher competition on average, playing against opponents ranked 369.13, compared to Spiteri who faced players with an average rank of 496.91.
Charaeva has shown to convert 43% of her breakpoint opportunities recently, while Spiteri has a conversion rate of 36%. If the match extends to a deciding set, Spiteri has a superior 60% win rate over the past year, compared to Charaeva's 50%. Despite Spiteri's strength in decisiveness, Charaeva's overall competitive stats, surface performance, and opponent quality indicate a slight edge over Spiteri in this match.
Charaeva vs Spiteri Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Alina Charaeva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aneta Kucmova
Player
Alina Charaeva
62%
(
64 of
103)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
52 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Mia Ristic
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
74%
(
55 of
74)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Alina Charaeva
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
8
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
32%
(
12 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
34 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Marina Bassols Ribera
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Nina Stojanovic
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diana Martynov
Player
Alina Charaeva
79%
(
89 of
112)
1st Serve %
53%
(
54 of
102)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
51%
(
45 of
89)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
53%
(
59 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
55 of
102)
108
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Alina Charaeva
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Eva Vedder
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Dalila Spiteri Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
.jpg)
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Dalila Spiteri
69%
(
70 of
102)
1st Serve %
74%
(
74 of
100)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
49 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dalila Spiteri
Player
Beatrice Ricci
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dalila Spiteri
Player
Miriana Tona
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
62
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalila Spiteri
Player
Anna Jelinkova
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Oleksandra Oliynykova
Player
Dalila Spiteri
81%
(
70 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
96)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dalila Spiteri
Player
Lilli Tagger
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
36 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dalila Spiteri
Player
Arina Gabriela Vasilescu
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
45%
(
19 of
42)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
48
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dalila Spiteri
Player
Barbara Straszewska
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (163/92) | Win/Loss | 58% (281/206) |
| 61% (349/223) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (619/465) |
| 55% (2856/2333) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5141/4511) |
| 67% (71/35) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (52/39) |
| 63% (62/36) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (183/137) |
| 59% (30/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (46/30) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 416 | Aces Total | 442 |
| 0.47 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1177 | Total Double Faults | 1155 |
| 1:42:39 | Average Match Time | 1:17:50 |
| 437.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 477.71 |
| 61% (9758/15959) | 1st Serve % | 65% (16483/25483) |
| 62% (6067/9758) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (9816/16483) |
| 43% (2647/6201) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (4235/8998) |
| 51% (1152/2278) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1555/3227) |
| 49% (7965/16255) | Return Points Win % | 46% (11513/24820) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (1/1) | Main Tour W/L | 18% (2/9) |
| 62% (127/77) | Challenger W/L | 57% (143/107) |
| 71% (35/14) | Futures W/L | 60% (136/89) |
| 63% (156/246) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (275/468) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 17% (1/6) |
| 49% (26/53) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (39/73) |
| 57% (39/69) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (60/118) |
| 90% (156/140) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (292/248) |
| 10% (156/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (292/42) |
| 22% (99/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (195/32) |
Charaeva vs. Spiteri Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
