Alibek Kachmazov vs Benjamin Hassan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W W L W L
Form
W L W W L W L L L LHead-To-Head: Kachmazov 1 - 0 Hassan
They have played 3 sets in total, with Kachmazov winning 2 and Hassan winning 1. The last match between Kachmazov and Hassan was at the Thionville Challenger, 05-03-2025, Round: Second, Surface: I.hard, with Alibek Kachmazov getting the victory 6-3 4-6 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Alibek Kachmazov | 1 |
| Benjamin Hassan | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Thionville Challenger(05-03-2025)
6
3
4
6
7
5
| Kachmazov | Stats | Hassan |
|---|---|---|
| 54% (15-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (12-15) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 161 | Ranking | 239 |
| 161 | Highest Rank | 143 |
| 22 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 8 | Titles | 2 |
| 60% (205-136) | Career Total W/L | 59% (319-223) |
| $169,735 | Career Prize Money | $262,000 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gauff VS Raducanu PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome wta
12 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fils VS Zverev PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
13 May 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Benjamin Hassan
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
104)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 14 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:16:47 | Average Match Time | 2:16:47 |
| 61% (59/97) | 1st Serve % | 56% (58/104) |
| 76% (45/59) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (37/58) |
| 47% (18/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (22/46) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 43% (45/104) | Return Points Win % | 35% (34/97) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kachmazov vs Hassan Match Preview :
When analyzing the battle between Kachmazov and Hassan, intriguing questions arise about their recent performance and how it might predict the outcome of this head-to-head clash. One critical aspect is their second serve performance over the past six months. Kachmazov has secured a slight edge, winning 45.33% of points on his second serve, while Hassan stands at 43.88%. Does this marginal lead tip the balance in Kachmazov's favor?
On the flip side, in return games, the stats tell a different story. Hassan has been slightly more adept at claiming points on his opponents' second serve, with a rate of 45.73% compared to Kachmazov's 43.53%. Indeed, when examining first serve return performance, Hassan maintains an advantage at 27.87% against Kachmazov's 24.52%. Might these return stats indicate a potential advantage for Hassan in this matchup?
An intriguing aspect of match predictions lies in how players handle high-pressure situations such as breakpoints. Recently, Hassan has managed to save 56.58% of the breakpoints he faces, just edging out Kachmazov's 55.27% in such scenarios. Perhaps this is a crucial factor tipping the scales towards Hassan during critical moments in the match.
A broader look at their overall performance over the past year shows Kachmazov winning 55.07% of his matches, whereas Hassan has secured 51.25%. When it comes to surface preference, Kachmazov shines on indoor hard courts with a career win rate of 68%, while Hassan dominates on clay, boasting a 62% success rate. Will the match surface influence their performance on the day?
With both players predominantly competing in Challengers/ITF tournaments of more than $10K, their win rates are closely matched, at roughly 53% each. It's worth noting, though, that Hassan has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 222.79 against Kachmazov's 267.72. Does this suggest Hassan's previous matches might have prepared him better for this duel?
If the contest stretches into a deciding set, Hassan again carries a slight edge, having won 52% of such situations over the last year against Kachmazov's 50%. Furthermore, Hassan's ability to convert breakpoints stands out, with a recent conversion rate of 33.66% compared to Kachmazov's 24.64%. Such statistics are invaluable for those keen on live betting predictions.
Taking all these factors into account, one might conclude that although Kachmazov demonstrates solid strengths, Hassan's return and breakpoint conversion stats give him a slight upper hand. Consequently, these statistics might hint at Hassan emerging victorious in this intriguing encounter.
Alibek Kachmazov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
62%
(
72 of
116)
1st Serve %
53%
(
62 of
118)
11
Aces
13
9
Double Faults
4
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
38%
(
44 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
54 of
118)
126
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
James McCabe
50%
(
34 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
41 of
76)
8
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
33 of
41)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Adam Walton
51%
(
60 of
118)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
13
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
6
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
48%
(
28 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
44 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
113
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Fajing Sun
49%
(
39 of
80)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
83)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
61%
(
70 of
115)
1st Serve %
51%
(
57 of
111)
6
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
44 of
57)
64%
(
29 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
37 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
111)
119
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Yosuke Watanuki
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
38%
(
21 of
56)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Omar Jasika
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
18 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Rio Noguchi
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
10
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Benjamin Hassan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Benjamin Hassan
48%
(
41 of
86)
1st Serve %
50%
(
52 of
103)
1
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
10
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
36%
(
16 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
50%
(
43 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Benjamin Hassan
58%
(
63 of
108)
1st Serve %
47%
(
56 of
120)
2
Aces
4
16
Double Faults
4
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
43%
(
46 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
59 of
120)
121
Total Points Won
107
|
7-5 5-7 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Benjamin Hassan
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Benjamin Hassan
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
65)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(7) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Benjamin Hassan
56%
(
56 of
100)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
82)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Ugo Blanchet
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
54 of
100)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
53 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(5) 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Benjamin Hassan
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Ugo Blanchet
53%
(
64 of
120)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
50%
(
28 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
45 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
118
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (205/136) | Win/Loss | 59% (319/223) |
| 58% (456/329) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (726/563) |
| 53% (3986/3596) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6375/5902) |
| 58% (90/65) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (59/41) |
| 49% (27/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (192/122) |
| 67% (88/43) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (66/57) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) |
| 0.42 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 1547 | Aces Total | 1882 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 998 | Total Double Faults | 1598 |
| 1:46:34 | Average Match Time | 1:24:16 |
| 435.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 420.21 |
| 56% (13324/23735) | 1st Serve % | 55% (18828/33955) |
| 70% (9324/13324) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (12965/18828) |
| 51% (5316/10410) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7629/15130) |
| 42% (1005/2403) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1425/3394) |
| 40% (9487/23578) | Return Points Win % | 40% (13521/33930) |
| 50% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 0% (0/2) | Masters W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 68% (15/7) |
| 62% (13/8) | Main Tour W/L | 53% (10/9) |
| 56% (94/73) | Challenger W/L | 54% (162/137) |
| 65% (97/52) | Futures W/L | 68% (125/60) |
| 60% (199/333) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (310/531) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 80% (4/5) |
| 60% (75/124) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (89/166) |
| 53% (56/106) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (114/206) |
| 86% (207/178) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (298/256) |
| 13% (207/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (298/41) |
| 19% (134/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (244/61) |
Kachmazov vs. Hassan Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
