Alexis Nguyen vs Lisa Zaar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W L W W W L
Form
L W W W W L L W W LHead-to-head: Nguyen 1 - 0 Zaar
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nguyen winning 2 and Zaar winning 0. The last match between Nguyen and Zaar was at the W50 Spring, 18-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Alexis Nguyen getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
W50 Spring(18-02-2025)
6
4
6
1
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Alexis Nguyen
Player
Lisa Zaar
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
81%
(
39 of
48)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
5
0
Aces (Total)
0
0
Total Double Faults
1
1:17:35
Average Match Time
1:17:35
58% (34/59)
1st Serve %
81% (39/48)
68% (23/34)
1st Serve Win %
44% (17/39)
52% (13/25)
2nd Serve Win %
33% (3/9)
71% (5/7)
Break Points Won % (Total)
20% (2/10)
58% (28/48)
Return Points Win %
39% (23/59)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Alexis Nguyen vs Lisa Zaar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Alexis Nguyen 1 - 0 Lisa Zaar
- Significant Trends in Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, there has been a noticeable distinction in the second serve performance of Nguyen and Zaar. Nguyen has achieved a commendable success rate of 42.71% on their second serve, while Zaar trails slightly behind at 41.41%. This correlation between their second serve performance and the accuracy of match predictions holds considerable weight.
- Insights from Return Game Statistics: An analysis of return game statistics further illuminates the contrasting abilities of Nguyen and Zaar. Nguyen, in recent form, has impressively triumphed in 60.98% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Zaar's success percentage stands at 58.91%. The disparity is more pronounced when considering first serve returns, with Nguyen at 36.07% and Zaar at 46.4%. Undoubtedly, these figures establish a crucial factor in predicting the favored contender in this eagerly anticipated head-to-head matchup.
- Analyzing Performance Under Pressure: A key aspect to consider for in-game betting predictions is how players fare under pressure. Nguyen has exhibited resilience by saving 36.84% of breakpoints in recent matches. In contrast, Zaar has impressively saved 52.71%, indicating a valuable statistic to gauge performance and make informed predictions.
- Overall Performance Overview: Over the past year, Nguyen has maintained a balanced win-loss record, triumphing in 50% of matches played (W/L 12/12). Conversely, Zaar has achieved a commendable win rate of 66.67% (W/L 38/19). These statistics provide a comprehensive overview for predicting the outcome of their thrilling clash.
- Examining Preferred Playing Surfaces: Nguyen has demonstrated exceptional proficiency on I.hard, possessing an exemplary career win percentage of 75% (W/L 3/1). In contrast, their performance on Clay has been comparably weaker, managing to secure a victory in only 40% of matches played (W/L 2/3). Zaar excels on I.hard as well, boasting a career win rate of 65% (W/L 15/8). On Clay, Zaar maintains a respectable 57% win rate (W/L 44/33). This substantial disparity ultimately plays a pivotal role in understanding each player's strengths and weaknesses.
- Evaluating Player Level: In the previous year, Nguyen has primarily competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments worth $10K. Within this realm, Nguyen has attained a commendable success rate of 57.14% (W/L 8/6). Conversely, Zaar has predominantly participated in the more challenging Challengers/ITF tournaments valued at over $10K. Zaar's impressive record stands at a 59.38% win rate (W/L 19/13). Hence, when predicting the favored player, it is imperative to consider the event level at which they have consistently competed.
- Evaluating Opponent Quality: Over the preceding 12 months, Nguyen has encountered opponents possessing an average ranking of 323.79. In comparison, Zaar has faced adversaries with an average ranking of 420.47. This insightful statistic significantly contributes to predicting the outcome of their upcoming clash.
- Deciding Set Performance: For those engrossed in live predictions and betting strategies, it is crucial to assess the performance of Nguyen and Zaar in deciding sets. Nguyen has triumphed in 25% of deciding sets played over the past year, whereas Zaar has emerged victorious in 58% of all matches played on tour. These figures provide invaluable guidance for predicting the outcome of their anticipated encounter.
- Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While past player performance undeniably aids in predicting tennis matches, it is equally essential to examine current event statistics to gauge a player's current form. In this regard, referring to the relevant section below is advisable, especially if either player has already competed in the ongoing tournament. Additionally, it is important to consider that certain players exhibit enhanced performance at specific events, adding another layer of complexity to predicting the outcome of their clash.
- Break Point Conversion Analysis: In recent form, Nguyen has adeptly converted 45.24% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Zaar has impressively capitalized on 54.2% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This significant statistic proves invaluable for in-game live betting, particularly when either player finds themselves with a crucial breakpoint opportunity.
- If you possess an inclination towards models that effectively predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. Kindly note that it caters specifically to statisticians and avid followers of intricate statistical analyses.
Alexis Nguyen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Alexis Nguyen
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
105)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Nguyen
Player
Natsuho Arakawa
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexis Nguyen
Player
Brandy Walker
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
0
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 1-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Alexis Nguyen
69%
(
75 of
108)
1st Serve %
73%
(
60 of
82)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
41%
(
44 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
95
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Nguyen
Player
Lisa Zaar
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
81%
(
39 of
48)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julie Belgraver
Player
Alexis Nguyen
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
38%
(
17 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexis Nguyen
Player
Jada Bui
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
52%
(
33 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Alexis Nguyen
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Lisa Zaar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kylie Mckenzie
Player
Lisa Zaar
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
52%
(
14 of
27)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
21 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Kolie Allen
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 6-7(5) 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Nguyen
Player
Lisa Zaar
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
81%
(
39 of
48)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cadence Brace
Player
Lisa Zaar
69%
(
73 of
106)
1st Serve %
91%
(
100 of
110)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
51%
(
37 of
73)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
51 of
100)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
80%
(
8 of
10)
49%
(
52 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
109
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Solana Sierra
86%
(
70 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
0-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-7(7) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Ekaterine Gorgodze
80%
(
73 of
91)
1st Serve %
79%
(
69 of
87)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
22%
(
4 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
44 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Hu
Player
Lisa Zaar
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
84%
(
72 of
86)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
56% (29/23)
Win/Loss
59% (88/61)
57% (68/52)
Sets Win/Loss
57% (199/148)
54% (594/516)
Games Win/Loss
53% (1716/1505)
56% (24/19)
Hard Win/Loss
59% (29/20)
40% (2/3)
Clay Win/Loss
57% (44/33)
75% (3/1)
Indoor Hard W/L
65% (15/8)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.03
Aces Per Game
0.01
17
Aces Total
23
0.11
Double Faults Per Game
0.38
61
Total Double Faults
596
1st Match
Average Match Time
1:42:31
355.5
Average Opponent Rank
413.26
62% (1165/1891)
1st Serve %
71% (6323/8844)
58% (676/1165)
1st Serve Win %
57% (3574/6323)
44% (320/726)
2nd Serve Win %
41% (1042/2521)
51% (123/242)
Break Points Won % (Total)
52% (648/1254)
47% (911/1958)
Return Points Win %
50% (4403/8770)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
43% (9/12)
Challenger W/L
53% (46/40)
65% (20/11)
Futures W/L
67% (42/21)
56% (29/52)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
60% (88/147)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
44% (4/9)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
54% (20/37)
38% (6/16)
Deciding Set Win %
57% (29/51)
87% (31/27)
1st Set Won, Won Match
87% (87/76)
13% (31/4)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
13% (87/11)
10% (21/2)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
21% (62/13)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
