Alexis Galarneau vs Andrea Vavassori Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W W L W L
Form
W W W L W W W W L LHead-to-head: Galarneau 0 - 1 Vavassori
They have played 2 sets in total, with Galarneau winning 0 and Vavassori winning 2. The last match between Galarneau and Vavassori was at the Manama Challenger, 14-02-2025, Quarterfinals, Hard with Andrea Vavassori getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
Manama Challenger(14-02-2025)
6
2
6
1
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Andreeva PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells wta
15 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Alexis Galarneau
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
1
0
Sets Won
2
3
Games Won
12
1
Aces (Total)
4
5
Total Double Faults
0
1:1:50
Average Match Time
1:1:50
55% (29/53)
1st Serve %
59% (22/37)
41% (12/29)
1st Serve Win %
82% (18/22)
46% (11/24)
2nd Serve Win %
73% (11/15)
0% (0/0)
Break Points Won % (Total)
56% (5/9)
22% (8/37)
Return Points Win %
57% (30/53)
0% (0/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Alexis Galarneau vs Andrea Vavassori Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Alexis Galarneau 0 - 1 Andrea Vavassori
Second serve performance recent form: Vavassori's recent form shows a 50.57% winning rate on their second serve, while Galarneau has a 52.47% success rate. This statistic strongly correlates with match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Recent return stats reveal that Vavassori has won 47.83% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Galarneau boasts a 55.47% success rate. Additionally, in terms of first serve returns, Vavassori holds a 33.41% success rate, while Galarneau has a 29.63% success rate. These numbers play a significant role in determining the favored player in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Analyzing players' ability to handle pressure points, Galarneau has saved 63.95% of breakpoints in recent form, compared to Vavassori's 61.54% saving rate. This is a valuable statistic for making in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the past year, Galarneau has won 60% of their matches (W/L 48/32), while Vavassori has a winning rate of 53.33% (W/L 16/14). This provides an overall head-to-head prediction overview.
Best surface: On their best career surface, Galarneau triumphs on I.hard with a 59% win rate (W/L 59/41), while their worst career win rate is on Clay with 47% (W/L 26/29). In contrast, Vavassori's best surface is Hard, where they have a 60% win rate (W/L 84/56), and their worst surface is Grass, with a 33% win rate (W/L 4/8).
Player level: Within the last year, Galarneau has predominantly played in Challenger/ITF tournaments > $10K, achieving a 62.69% win rate (W/L 42/25). Vavassori, on the other hand, has primarily competed in the Main tour, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/5). When comparing players' stats to predict the favorite, it is crucial to consider the level of the events they have been participating in.
Opponent quality stats: Throughout the previous 12 months, Galarneau faced opponents with an average rank of 251.82, whereas Vavassori's opponents held an average rank of 192.47.
Deciding set performance vs all players: For live predictions and betting, it's worth noting that Galarneau has won 40% of deciding sets in the last 12 months, while Vavassori has a 62% success rate in all tour matches.
Current event H2H stats: While past player performance is generally helpful in predicting tennis matches, in-progress events require consideration of current event stats to assess players' current form. For this, please refer to the section below (if matches have already been played in the current event). Additionally, some players exhibit superior performance at certain events, and this aspect should be taken into account when predicting the outcome.
Break point conversion: Recent form shows that Galarneau has converted 45.12% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Vavassori has a conversion rate of 42.86% when presented with chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic is instrumental for in-game live betting tips when either player faces a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, you may find this article to be a valuable resource (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Alexis Galarneau Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Alexis Galarneau
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
46%
(
34 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Arthur Cazaux
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Alexis Galarneau
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Valentin Vacherot
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
6
Aces
17
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
53 of
63)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
26 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Michael Geerts
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Karan Singh
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Alexis Galarneau
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Ilia Simakin
65%
(
70 of
107)
1st Serve %
74%
(
66 of
89)
5
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
51 of
66)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
34%
(
36 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
27 of
89)
98
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Denis Yevseyev
63%
(
74 of
117)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
52 of
74)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
43 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
116
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(1) 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Alexis Galarneau
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
25 of
45)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Andrea Vavassori Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Andrea Vavassori
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Marton Fucsovics
Player
Andrea Vavassori
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
48 of
68)
74%
(
23 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
110)
109
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Brandon Holt
57%
(
67 of
117)
1st Serve %
73%
(
68 of
93)
9
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
46 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Alexis Galarneau
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
78%
(
51 of
65)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
72
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Dimitar Kuzmanov
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
77%
(
61 of
79)
14
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Andrea Vavassori
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Felix Auger Aliassime
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
19 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
66
|
6-7(3) 6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Niels Visker
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
20%
(
12 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
56% (194/152)
Win/Loss
56% (303/234)
55% (442/364)
Sets Win/Loss
55% (691/572)
52% (3973/3688)
Games Win/Loss
52% (6291/5776)
57% (108/81)
Hard Win/Loss
60% (86/58)
47% (26/29)
Clay Win/Loss
58% (173/126)
59% (59/41)
Indoor Hard W/L
49% (40/42)
50% (1/1)
Grass Win/Loss
33% (4/8)
0.28
Aces Per Game
0.35
1042
Aces Total
2039
0.27
Double Faults Per Game
0.3
1005
Total Double Faults
1767
1:38:25
Average Match Time
1:23:38
393.34
Average Opponent Rank
435.14
58% (13403/23140)
1st Serve %
62% (19675/31937)
69% (9214/13403)
1st Serve Win %
71% (13934/19675)
51% (4980/9737)
2nd Serve Win %
50% (6104/12263)
42% (972/2311)
Break Points Won % (Total)
42% (1255/2961)
40% (9147/22777)
Return Points Win %
39% (12308/31755)
29% (2/5)
Slam W/L
54% (14/12)
25% (2/6)
Masters W/L
50% (7/7)
40% (2/3)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
50% (2/2)
Main Tour W/L
48% (23/25)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
56% (153/118)
Challenger W/L
58% (131/96)
65% (33/18)
Futures W/L
58% (127/93)
56% (191/342)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
56% (294/523)
67% (2/3)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
56% (5/9)
52% (64/124)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
51% (102/200)
50% (56/111)
Deciding Set Win %
54% (98/182)
85% (198/169)
1st Set Won, Won Match
85% (294/250)
15% (198/29)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
15% (294/44)
16% (148/23)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
21% (243/51)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
