A. Zverev
To Win
J. Thompson
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W L W L L WForm
W W L L W L W W W LThey have played 5 sets in total, with Zverev winning 5 and Fearnley winning 0. The last match between Zverev and Fearnley was at the Miami Open - Miami, 22-03-2025, Second, Hard with Alexander Zverev getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Alexander Zverev | 2 |
Jacob Fearnley | 0 |
Miami Open - Miami(22-03-2025)
24 Mar 2025 / Third
Miami Open - Miami atp
24 Mar 2025 / Third
Miami Open - Miami atp
24 Mar 2025 / Third
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jacob Fearnley
90%
(
44 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
6-3 6-4 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jacob Fearnley
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
52 of
79)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
23 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
68
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The anticipated match between Zverev and Fearnley is drawing attention with its intriguing statistical backdrop, offering insights into their recent performances. Over the past six months, Zverev has outperformed Fearnley on second serve points, winning 45.23% of them compared to Fearnley's 43.49%. Such figures hold a significant correlation with match outcome predictions.
Looking at return game stats, Fearnley slightly edges out Zverev by winning 44.38% of points on opponents' second serves, whereas Zverev has won 43.44%. Their first serve return statistics reflect similar competitiveness with Fearnley at 24.45% and Zverev at 23.19%. These metrics are crucial in forecasting the favorite for their head-to-head clash.
Break point scenarios reveal Zverev has a slight advantage, successfully saving 61.73% of breakpoints in recent form, while Fearnley has managed to save 58.78%. This is a crucial statistic for gauging in-game betting opportunities. This saving ability directly influences in-game dynamics, helpful for live betting decisions when either player is on the brink of being broken.
Over the last year, both players have exhibited a remarkable win rate, with Zverev winning 76.14% of his matches and Fearnley winning 76.56%. It's worth noting that Zverev has predominantly competed in the Masters series, achieving a winning rate of 78.13%, whereas Fearnley has played mainly in Challenger/ITF tournaments, boasting an impressive win rate of 86.05%. This variance in competition level should be considered when determining the favorite.
Career surface statistics also add another layer to the analysis. Zverev shines on clay courts with a 70% win ratio, whereas Fearnley thrives on indoor hard courts, showing an 82% success rate. Both players display comparable, yet inferior, statistics on grass courts – Zverev with 66% and Fearnley with 67%.
Historically, Zverev has dominated their direct encounters, winning the only match against Fearnley at the Australian Open in straight sets. Across these matches, Zverev has claimed all three sets, leaving Fearnley yet to secure a set against him. During these matches, the average duration has been just over two hours, providing further context into their head-to-head dynamic.
Zverev has faced opponents with a higher average ranking of 119.01 compared to Fearnley's 207.64, highlighting the more rigorous competition faced by Zverev. Such statistics signify a potential advantage in terms of experience against higher-ranked opposition, aligning with the odds in his favor.
Considering their deciding set performance, Zverev has clinched 52% of such situations over the last 12 months against all opponents, while Fearnley boasts an impressive 85% win rate in deciding sets. This will be an essential metric if their encounter stretches to a final set.
Finally, when observing current form at the ongoing event, these historical statistics provide a strong prediction foundation. Given Zverev's marginally more consistent conversion rates on break points at 28.47% compared to Fearnley's 26.99%, it suggests that Zverev holds a slight edge under pivotal moments.
In conclusion, while both players bring strong performances into this match, the cumulative weight of these statistics, including head-to-head outcomes, competitive rank of opponents, and situational performance, indicates that Zverev is positioned as the probable victor in their upcoming contest.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jacob Fearnley
90%
(
44 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Alexander Zverev
67%
(
90 of
135)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
10
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
2
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
39%
(
53 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
38 of
106)
120
Total Points Won
121
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Learner Tien
Player
Alexander Zverev
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
44 of
59)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alexander Zverev
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
28 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
24 of
86)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Francisco Comesana
Player
Alexander Zverev
60%
(
56 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alexander Zverev
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
68 of
115)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
52 of
115)
104
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(1) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alexander Zverev
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Alexander Zverev
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
59 of
82)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alexander Zverev
Player
Dusan Lajovic
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Jannik Sinner
Player
Alexander Zverev
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
95)
6
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
48 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
45 of
65)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
23 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
107
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jacob Fearnley
90%
(
44 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
8
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
98)
13
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(6) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Tristan Boyer
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
0
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Thijs Boogaard
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Nuno Borges
Player
Jacob Fearnley
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jacob Fearnley
Player
James Duckworth
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
70)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
41 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Joao Fonseca
Player
Jacob Fearnley
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Lukas Klein
Player
Jacob Fearnley
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
46%
(
32 of
70)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Lukas Pokorny
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
2
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
View full predicted draw for Zverev in Miami