A. Bublik
To Win
F. Comesana
To Win
Alexander Bublik vs Matteo Gigante Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W W W W W
Form
W W W W W L W W L LHead-2-Head: Bublik 1 - 0 Gigante
They have played 2 sets in total, with Bublik winning 2 and Gigante winning 0. The last match between Bublik and Gigante was at the Turin Challenger, 13-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Alexander Bublik getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Alexander Bublik | 1 |
| Matteo Gigante | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Turin Challenger(13-05-2025)
Alexander Bublik
Matteo Gigante
6
3
6
1
| Bublik | Stats | Gigante |
|---|---|---|
| 63% (27-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (21-15) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 30 | Ranking | 134 |
| 17 | Highest Rank | 130 |
| 28 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 16 | Titles | 6 |
| 57% (378-281) | Career Total W/L | 58% (163-116) |
| $5,554,550 | Career Prize Money | $478,985 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
24 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cazaux VS Buse PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Etcheverry VS Agut PREDICTION Grass
Mallorca Championships - Mallorca atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Alexander Bublik
Player
Matteo Gigante
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:0:29 | Average Match Time | 1:0:29 |
| 71% (34/48) | 1st Serve % | 62% (31/50) |
| 85% (29/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (18/31) |
| 43% (6/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (7/19) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (25/50) | Return Points Win % | 27% (13/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bublik vs Gigante Match Preview :
- Recently, Gigante has been slightly more successful on second serve points, winning 44.84% compared to Bublik's 44.71%.
- Question: How do they compare on return games? Gigante appears more adept, winning 48.93% of opponents' second serve points, surpassing Bublik's 43.79%.
- When returning first serves, Gigante also outperforms Bublik, with 27.49% against Bublik's 22.99% success rate.
- Bublik seems more resilient under pressure, saving 61.54% of breakpoints, while Gigante saves 48.54%.
- Over the past year, Gigante has won 53.45% of his matches, whereas Bublik has a 43.14% win rate.
- Could surface type influence the match outcome? Gigante excels on Hard courts with a 71% win rate, while Bublik's best results have been on Indoor Hard courts, winning 62%.
- The level of competition differs significantly; Gigante mainly competes in Challenger/ITF events, whereas Bublik plays on the Main tour.
- Gigante's opponents have an average rank of 207.79, while Bublik faces more challenging competition with an average opponent rank of 76.59.
- In deciding sets, Gigante holds a strong advantage, having won 70% of such scenarios, compared to Bublik's 38% success rate.
- Both players have similar breakpoint conversion rates, with Gigante at 33.33% and Bublik at 33.04%.
Editorial Prediction (May 13, 2025, UTC):
As we evaluate the recent stats and performance patterns of Gigante and Bublik, certain key aspects stand out that may dictate the outcome of this matchup.
Gigante has shown superiority in return games, particularly on both second and first serve returns. This ability to effectively counter Bublik's serve could give Gigante an essential advantage in constructing rallies and gaining control during points.
However, Bublik's capability to perform under pressure, evidenced by his higher breakpoint saving rate, indicates he could turn tight games around, making him a formidable opponent even when trailing.
The playing surface also plays a crucial role, with Gigante excelling on Hard courts, which aligns with the current event setting. Despite Bublik's superior experience on the Main tour, Gigante's better average results and consistency in deciding sets indicate his mental fortitude in crucial moments.
In conclusion, while both players have their strengths, the overall analysis suggests that Gigante's ability to persist in long rallies, combined with his success on the current surface, positions him as the likely winner of this match.
Bublik vs Gigante Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Alexander Bublik Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Daniil Medvedev
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
11
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Karen Khachanov
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
19
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
54 of
65)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
55 of
67)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
28 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
24 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Tomas Machac
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
19
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Jannik Sinner
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
15
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
44 of
57)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
32%
(
29 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Alexandre Muller
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
12
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Alexander Bublik
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
7 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
20 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Jack Draper
60%
(
77 of
129)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
8
Aces
12
7
Double Faults
4
81%
(
62 of
77)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
52 of
73)
44%
(
23 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
44 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
125
Total Points Won
110
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Henrique Rocha
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
9
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
8
87%
(
41 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
94
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo Gigante Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Matteo Gigante
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Matteo Gigante
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
103)
2
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
30 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
6-1 3-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
102)
6
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
35 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Matteo Gigante
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
10
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
2
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Stefanos Tsitsipas
60%
(
76 of
126)
1st Serve %
64%
(
77 of
121)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
60 of
76)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
57 of
77)
48%
(
24 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
33%
(
42 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
46 of
121)
130
Total Points Won
117
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Benjamin Hassan
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
47%
(
42 of
90)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
90)
99
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Elmer Moller
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (378/281) | Win/Loss | 58% (163/116) |
| 54% (871/730) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (370/290) |
| 51% (7957/7677) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (3251/2979) |
| 55% (138/112) | Hard Win/Loss | 71% (56/23) |
| 52% (72/66) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (93/64) |
| 62% (120/75) | Indoor Hard W/L | 26% (9/25) |
| 63% (48/28) | Grass Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) |
| 0.83 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 6384 | Aces Total | 886 |
| 0.49 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 3723 | Total Double Faults | 933 |
| 1:25:40 | Average Match Time | 1:35:6 |
| 372.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 347.65 |
| 59% (27089/45957) | 1st Serve % | 59% (11227/18888) |
| 76% (20478/27083) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (7670/11227) |
| 45% (8567/18868) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3796/7661) |
| 41% (1569/3832) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (876/2017) |
| 37% (16628/45127) | Return Points Win % | 41% (7855/19134) |
| 50% (33/33) | Slam W/L | 58% (14/10) |
| 42% (33/45) | Masters W/L | 45% (5/6) |
| 61% (11/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (129/107) | Main Tour W/L | 20% (2/8) |
| 65% (104/57) | Challenger W/L | 57% (105/78) |
| 69% (68/30) | Futures W/L | 73% (37/14) |
| 58% (345/592) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (158/268) |
| 46% (26/56) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 38% (3/8) |
| 54% (140/258) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (49/85) |
| 62% (131/213) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (54/96) |
| 86% (341/293) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (170/136) |
| 14% (341/48) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (170/32) |
| 26% (318/83) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (109/25) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
