Alexander Bublik vs Francisco Comesana Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W W W W L
Form
L W W L W L L L L LH2H: Bublik 0 - 0 Comesana
| Bublik | Stats | Comesana |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (27-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 51% (18-17) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 31 | Ranking | 65 |
| 17 | Highest Rank | 61 |
| 28 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 16 | Titles | 10 |
| 57% (378-282) | Career Total W/L | 63% (285-164) |
| $5,554,550 | Career Prize Money | $664,490 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Swiatek VS Samsonova PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Shelton PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
09 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bublik vs Comesana Match Preview :
- Recent performance on second serve shows a slight edge for Comesana, winning 47.5% of points compared to Bublik's 45.12%.
- Examining return game stats, Comesana slightly outperforms Bublik on both first and second serve returns, with higher percentages in both categories.
- Under pressure, Bublik slightly leads in breakpoint saves with 58.77% compared to Comesana's 57.46%, indicating Bublik's resilience when facing breakpoints.
- Overall match performance in the past year favors Comesana with a winning rate of 60%, while Bublik's is at 53.45%.
- On preferred surfaces, Bublik excels on Grass with a 63% win rate, though Grass is not the current surface. Comesana performs best on Clay with a 65% win rate, a key factor if this is a Clay event.
- When considering the level of competition, Bublik has faced higher-ranked opponents, playing at the Main tour level with an average opponent rank of 72.34, whereas Comesana often competes in Challengers/ITF with an average rank of 179.87.
- In deciding sets, Comesana holds an advantage, winning 68% of them compared to Bublik's 53%, which could be crucial if the match is tightly contested.
- Analyzing break point conversions, Bublik slightly outperforms Comesana, successfully converting 31.18% of opportunities, slightly higher than Comesana's 29.81%.
- Question: Which player might have the advantage if the match progresses to a deciding set? The answer is Comesana, based on his higher win rate in deciding sets.
Editorial Prediction (June 23, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Bublik and Comesana presents an intriguing scenario with both players showcasing distinct strengths. While Bublik features a better performance under pressure and a slight edge in breakpoint conversions, Comesana excels with strong second serve returns and overall winning percentage.
Comesana's proficiency in deciding sets and recent superior return game statistics might play a pivotal role in a potential tightly-knit match. Despite being less experienced against high-ranked opponents compared to Bublik, Comesana's current form could be the deciding factor.
Considering all factors, Comesana seems to have a marginal but decisive edge, making him the likely winner of this upcoming tennis encounter.
Bublik vs Comesana Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Alexander Bublik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Alexander Bublik
58%
(
88 of
151)
1st Serve %
58%
(
86 of
148)
8
Aces
21
6
Double Faults
8
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
65 of
86)
54%
(
34 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
36%
(
54 of
151)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
55 of
148)
152
Total Points Won
147
|
6-4 3-6 4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Daniil Medvedev
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
11
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Karen Khachanov
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
70%
(
67 of
96)
19
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
54 of
65)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
55 of
67)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
28 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
24 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Tomas Machac
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
19
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Jannik Sinner
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
15
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
44 of
57)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
32%
(
29 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Alexandre Muller
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
12
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Alexander Bublik
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
7 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
20 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Alexander Bublik
Player
Jack Draper
60%
(
77 of
129)
1st Serve %
69%
(
73 of
106)
8
Aces
12
7
Double Faults
4
81%
(
62 of
77)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
52 of
73)
44%
(
23 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
44 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
125
Total Points Won
110
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Francisco Comesana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Francisco Comesana
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
98)
6
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
10
85%
(
44 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
98)
104
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Francisco Comesana
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Carreno-Busta
Player
Francisco Comesana
66%
(
78 of
118)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
42 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
106)
124
Total Points Won
100
|
6-2 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Francisco Comesana
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Francisco Comesana
68%
(
93 of
136)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
10%
(
2 of
20)
41%
(
56 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
117
Total Points Won
115
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Daniel Altmaier
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
73
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Francisco Comesana
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Arthur Fils
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (378/282) | Win/Loss | 63% (285/164) |
| 54% (873/733) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (625/407) |
| 51% (7981/7703) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (5207/4472) |
| 55% (138/112) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (22/20) |
| 52% (72/66) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (261/139) |
| 62% (120/75) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 62% (48/29) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) |
| 0.83 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 6405 | Aces Total | 1317 |
| 0.49 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 3731 | Total Double Faults | 740 |
| 1:25:50 | Average Match Time | 1:32:16 |
| 372.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 265.85 |
| 59% (27175/46105) | 1st Serve % | 67% (17287/25970) |
| 76% (20543/27169) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (11505/17287) |
| 45% (8595/18930) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4371/8683) |
| 41% (1574/3844) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1284/2953) |
| 37% (16682/45278) | Return Points Win % | 42% (11301/26731) |
| 49% (33/34) | Slam W/L | 47% (7/8) |
| 42% (33/45) | Masters W/L | 55% (6/5) |
| 61% (11/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (129/107) | Main Tour W/L | 40% (12/18) |
| 65% (104/57) | Challenger W/L | 66% (106/54) |
| 69% (68/30) | Futures W/L | 66% (154/79) |
| 58% (345/592) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (275/428) |
| 46% (26/57) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (6/12) |
| 54% (140/259) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (65/125) |
| 61% (131/214) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (74/125) |
| 86% (341/293) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (273/246) |
| 14% (341/48) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (273/27) |
| 26% (319/83) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (176/40) |
Bublik vs. Comesana Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
