Alexander Babanine vs Shohei Chikami Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Babanine vs Chikami analysis and find out who is favored!
Alexander Babanine vs Shohei Chikami Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Babanine has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Chikami has won 31.82%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Babanine, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chikami has won 48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.82% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Babanine has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chikami has saved 20% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Babanine has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Chikami winning 42.86% (W/L 9/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Babanine has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 18/ 17), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 53/ 54). Chikami has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 10/ 10).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Babanine winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Babanine winning 2 and Chikami winning 0. The last match between Babanine and Chikami was at the Indonesia F3 (Jakarta), 04-08-2018, Q1 round, Hard with Alexander Babanine getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Babanine and Chikami have played a deciding set 0 times, with Babanine winning 0 times and Chikami 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Babanine winning 0, and Chikami 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Babanine has played against opponents with an average rank of while Chikami has played against players with an average rank of 32.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Babanine has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chikami has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Babanine has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chikami has converted 42.11% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Babanine 1 - 0 Chikami
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
50% (73-73)
Career Total W/L
55% (71-57)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
60% (6-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Alexander Babanine | Shohei Chikami |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Alexander Babanine | Shohei Chikami |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 62% (13/8) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (117/94) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.03 |
Aces Total | 0 | 3 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.08 |
DFs Total | 0 | 8 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 13.7 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 66% (83/126) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 69% (57/83) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (15/43) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 29% (35/120) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/10) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 86% (7/6) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 14% (7/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Alexander Babanine Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Thomas Braithwaite
Player
Alexander Babanine
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Alexander Babanine
Player
John Amato
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
81%
(
38 of
47)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Hien Pham
Player
Alexander Babanine
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
2
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
33%
(
8 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(6) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jea Moon Lee
Player
Alexander Babanine
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 | w/o | H2H |
view more
Shohei Chikami Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 4-6 7-5 12-10 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Kousuke Ogura
Player
Shohei Chikami
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Alex Bolt
Player
Shohei Chikami
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
Q2 | 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H |
view more