A. Michelsen
To Win
S. Tsitsipas
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L L L W L WForm
L W W L L W W W W WThey have played 2 sets in total, with Michelsen winning 2 and Pellegrino winning 0. The last match between Michelsen and Pellegrino was at the Estoril Challenger, 04-05-2025, Round: Final, Surface: Clay, with Alex Michelsen getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Alex Michelsen | 1 |
Andrea Pellegrino | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Estoril Challenger(04-05-2025)
Michelsen | Stats | Pellegrino |
---|---|---|
58% (19-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 69% (25-11) |
1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
33 | Ranking | 136 |
32 | Highest Rank | 136 |
20 | Age | 28 |
- | Plays | R |
5 | Titles | 9 |
64% (148-85) | Career Total W/L | 53% (305-272) |
$1,562,700 | Career Prize Money | $190,420 |
1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
18 Jun 2025 / Second
cinch Championships - London atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Alex Michelsen
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 8 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
1:13:18 | Average Match Time | 1:13:18 |
75% (38/51) | 1st Serve % | 63% (35/56) |
74% (28/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (20/35) |
54% (7/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (10/21) |
80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2/5) |
46% (26/56) | Return Points Win % | 31% (16/51) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Within the context of recent second serve performance, Michelsen has demonstrated a slightly superior efficiency, winning 46.58% of points, as opposed to Pellegrino's 44.49%. This statistic is a crucial determinant of match prediction accuracy, playing a significant role in forecasting outcomes.
Analyzing return game statistics, Michelsen shows proficiency by winning 44.22% of their opponent's second serve points in recent activity. In comparison, Pellegrino captures 41.27% in the same category. For first serve returns, Pellegrino holds a slight edge with a 31.31% success rate, while Michelsen stands at 27.17%. These figures are pivotal in assessing which player might be favored in this head-to-head encounter.
When under pressure, Michelsen has proven adept at saving breakpoints, maintaining a 58.5% success rate, outpacing Pellegrino who has a 51.08% rate. This statistic is invaluable for in-game betting predictions and live analyses.
From a performance perspective over the past year, Michelsen boasts a winning percentage of 60.76% (with a win-loss record of 48/31). On the other hand, Pellegrino's winning percentage stands at 56.92% (win-loss: 37/28), providing a broader outlook on head-to-head predictions.
Surface preference plays a vital role in match outcomes. Michelsen performs best on indoor hard courts, maintaining a 73% win rate (37 wins to 14 losses), while clay surfaces prove less favorable with a 46% win rate (13/15). Conversely, Pellegrino's strongest performances emerge on clay courts at a 56% win rate (255/201), yet grass presents challenges at 20% (1/4).
Examining player level, Michelsen competed mostly on the Main tour over the past year, achieving a 66% win record (33 wins, 17 losses). Pellegrino's experience largely involves Challenger and ITF tournaments above the $10K threshold, with a 60.34% success rate (35/23). The level of competition inherently impacts predictive analytics between these players.
In terms of opponent quality, Michelsen's adversaries over the last year had an average rank of 100.89, contrasting with Pellegrino's opponents who averaged around 246.72. This factor, combined with the player's performance against such competition, enriches comparative evaluations.
For those looking at wagering tips during live matches, should this contest proceed to a deciding set, Michelsen has won 56% of such sets in the past year. Pellegrino shows a higher efficacy, winning 75% of deciding sets in tour matches.
In the area of breakpoint conversion, Michelsen managed to convert 31.95% of those opportunities, while Pellegrino has been slightly more adept with a conversion rate of 34.27%. This is a key statistic for those considering in-game betting strategies.
Taking into account these statistical insights, Michelsen's recent form in higher-level tours, along with a higher win percentage against tougher opponents, positions them as the more likely victor in this scenario, despite Pellegrino’s efficiency in deciding sets and breakpoints.
Michelsen vs Pellegrino Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alex Michelsen
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
42 of
57)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
89
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Justin Engel
Player
Alex Michelsen
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
5
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
5
100%
(
31 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
7 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alex Michelsen
Player
Gael Monfils
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
6
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
7
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
46 of
63)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Alex Michelsen
44%
(
35 of
79)
1st Serve %
72%
(
64 of
89)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nuno Borges
Player
Alex Michelsen
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
26 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Laslo Djere
Player
Alex Michelsen
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
34 of
49)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Alex Michelsen
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Alex Michelsen
Player
Miomir Kecmanovic
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Nerman Fatic
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
81%
(
51 of
63)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Luca Nardi
72%
(
59 of
82)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Francesco Passaro
81%
(
62 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Federico Bondioli
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Gabriele Piraino
68%
(
67 of
99)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
35%
(
35 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Marko Topo
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
11
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Stefano Napolitano
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
26%
(
18 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
64% (148/85) | Win/Loss | 53% (305/272) |
59% (343/234) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (706/645) |
53% (2927/2575) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (6378/6297) |
66% (80/42) | Hard Win/Loss | 39% (16/25) |
44% (14/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 56% (262/204) |
73% (37/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (26/39) |
61% (17/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) |
0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
919 | Aces Total | 1323 |
0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
521 | Total Double Faults | 1503 |
1:44:57 | Average Match Time | 1:34:39 |
276.06 | Average Opponent Rank | 460.2 |
67% (11341/17043) | 1st Serve % | 63% (23802/37688) |
70% (7912/11341) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (15590/23802) |
52% (2951/5702) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (7029/13886) |
43% (680/1598) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1633/3790) |
39% (6577/16909) | Return Points Win % | 40% (15064/37583) |
50% (7/7) | Slam W/L | 24% (4/13) |
36% (8/14) | Masters W/L | 20% (1/4) |
100% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
60% (51/34) | Main Tour W/L | 33% (8/16) |
70% (46/20) | Challenger W/L | 51% (196/189) |
78% (35/10) | Futures W/L | 66% (96/50) |
65% (136/209) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (302/567) |
45% (9/20) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
56% (56/100) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (87/168) |
58% (49/84) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (106/202) |
84% (140/117) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (300/245) |
16% (140/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (300/54) |
31% (93/29) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (276/59) |