Alex De Minaur vs Jacob Fearnley Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W L W W L
Form
L W W W W L W L W LHead-To-Head: Minaur 1 - 0 Fearnley
They have played 2 sets in total, with Minaur winning 2 and Fearnley winning 0. The last match between Minaur and Fearnley was at the Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell - Barcelona, 17-04-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Clay, with Alex De Minaur getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Alex De Minaur | 1 |
| Jacob Fearnley | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Barcelona Open Banc Sabadell - Barcelona(17-04-2025)
Alex De Minaur
Jacob Fearnley
6
1
6
2
| Minaur | Stats | Fearnley |
|---|---|---|
| 72% (26-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 63% (20-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 9 | Ranking | 54 |
| 6 | Highest Rank | 54 |
| 26 | Age | 23 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 11 | Titles | 6 |
| 64% (391-218) | Career Total W/L | 75% (93-31) |
| $11,636,530 | Career Prize Money | $525,545 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shevchenko VS Misolic PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
22 May 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Khachanov VS Ofner PREDICTION Clay
Gonet Geneva Open - Geneva atp
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Alex De Minaur
Player
Jacob Fearnley
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
42)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:2:54 | Average Match Time | 1:2:54 |
| 51% (23/45) | 1st Serve % | 40% (17/42) |
| 87% (20/23) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (10/17) |
| 59% (13/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (11/25) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 50% (21/42) | Return Points Win % | 27% (12/45) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Minaur vs Fearnley Match Preview :
Analyzing recent performances, Fearnley outshines Minaur in terms of saving breakpoints, with Fearnley saving 62.45% of breakpoints compared to Minaur’s 47.04%. Similarly, when matches extend to a deciding set, Fearnley also holds a strong advantage, having won 85% of such sets over the past year, while Minaur secures just 47% in these scenarios.
When examining their return game, Fearnley edges out Minaur in recent form stats, winning 43.78% of opponents' second serve points and 24.33% on first serve returns. In contrast, Minaur has secured 41.89% on second serve returns and 24.24% on first serves. Breaking these percentages, Fearnley also possesses a marginally better second serve point win rate of 45.15% compared to Minaur's 43.45% in their recent outings.
Considering overall performance over the past 12 months, Fearnley maintains a higher winning percentage of 75% with a record of 51 wins and 17 losses, while Minaur has recorded a 68.66% win rate with 46 wins and 21 losses. The opponent quality stats highlight that Minaur's average opponent ranking was 114.69, indicating a stronger level of competition compared to Fearnley’s average opponent ranking of 228.21.
Minaur has shown particular proficiency on grass courts, achieving a 69% win rate, though his performance diminishes on clay surfaces with a 57% win rate. Fearnley, on the other hand, excels on indoor hard courts with an 82% win rate, but his success slightly declines on clay to 67%. Tournament levels play a significant role as well, with Minaur competing predominantly on the Main tour (72% win rate), whereas Fearnley thrives in Challengers/ITF tournaments, achieving an impressive win rate of 86.05%.
In terms of break point conversion, Minaur is more effective, converting 33.33% of break points compared to Fearnley’s 27.01%. However, the overall comparison suggests Fearnley may be the favorite in this matchup due to his impressive record in deciding sets and under pressure performance. Given Fearnley’s superior stats in several key areas, he is likely to emerge victorious in their upcoming encounter based on this statistical analysis.
Minaur vs Fearnley Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Alex De Minaur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Alex De Minaur
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Hugo Dellien
40%
(
25 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Luca Nardi
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Lorenzo Musetti
Player
Alex De Minaur
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Denis Shapovalov
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
15%
(
6 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Alex De Minaur
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Jacob Fearnley
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
42)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jacob Fearnley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alexei Popyrin
Player
Jacob Fearnley
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Dusan Lajovic
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Jacob Fearnley
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Fabio Fognini
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Grigor Dimitrov
Player
Jacob Fearnley
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
11
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Tomas Machac
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
86)
9
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
9
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
80
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Hugo Dellien
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (391/218) | Win/Loss | 75% (93/31) |
| 61% (926/604) | Sets Win/Loss | 68% (197/91) |
| 54% (7770/6681) | Games Win/Loss | 57% (1512/1156) |
| 67% (183/91) | Hard Win/Loss | 73% (29/11) |
| 57% (74/55) | Clay Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) |
| 63% (83/49) | Indoor Hard W/L | 82% (46/10) |
| 69% (51/23) | Grass Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.44 |
| 2074 | Aces Total | 578 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.37 |
| 1511 | Total Double Faults | 485 |
| 1:44:27 | Average Match Time | 1:25:25 |
| 280.51 | Average Opponent Rank | 229.65 |
| 59% (25472/43531) | 1st Serve % | 61% (4663/7665) |
| 70% (17945/25489) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (3421/4663) |
| 53% (9645/18074) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1521/3002) |
| 43% (1912/4446) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (384/859) |
| 40% (18091/44935) | Return Points Win % | 42% (3325/8010) |
| 64% (54/31) | Slam W/L | 50% (3/3) |
| 54% (62/52) | Masters W/L | 67% (8/4) |
| 60% (21/14) | Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 67% (147/73) | Main Tour W/L | 53% (8/7) |
| 0% (0/3) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (52/26) | Challenger W/L | 82% (37/8) |
| 74% (55/19) | Futures W/L | 82% (36/8) |
| 64% (322/505) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 76% (90/118) |
| 65% (64/98) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 56% (121/217) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (20/31) |
| 58% (103/177) | Deciding Set Win % | 79% (27/34) |
| 88% (370/325) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 96% (77/74) |
| 12% (370/45) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 4% (77/3) |
| 28% (239/66) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 40% (47/19) |
Minaur vs. Fearnley Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
