Alex De Minaur vs Michal Przysiezny Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Minaur vs Przysiezny analysis and find out who is favored!
Alex De Minaur vs Michal Przysiezny Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Minaur has won 54.55% of points on his second serve, while Przysiezny has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Minaur, in recent form, has won 54.43% of his opponent's second serve points, while Przysiezny has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.67% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Minaur has saved 62.04% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Przysiezny has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Minaur has won 67.09% of matches played (W/L 53/ 26), with Przysiezny winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Minaur has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 55/ 46). Przysiezny has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 156/ 103), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 92/ 93).
- Player level: In the last year, Minaur has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 71.05% of matches (W/L 27/ 11), where as Przysiezny has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Minaur winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Minaur winning 2 and Przysiezny winning 0. The last match between Minaur and Przysiezny was at the Eckental Challenger, 29-10-2016, Q1 round, Carpet with Alex De Minaur getting the victory 1100038800.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Minaur and Przysiezny have played a deciding set 0 times, with Minaur winning 0 times and Przysiezny 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Minaur winning 0, and Przysiezny 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Minaur has played against opponents with an average rank of 85.8 while Przysiezny has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Minaur has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Przysiezny has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Minaur has converted 41.18% of breakpoint opportunities, and Przysiezny has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Minaur 1 - 0 Przysiezny
10
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
8
Main
1
Minor
10
Rank
9
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
57
High
40
Age
R
Plays
16
Total
0
Mast
8
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
8
Minor
Form
63% (329-191)
Career Total W/L
56% (465-368)
76% (19-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$8,460,240
Career Prize Money
$403,630
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Minaur VS Przysiezny H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Alex De Minaur | Michal Przysiezny |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 5 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 8 |
Avg Match Time | 1:26:0 | 1:26:0 |
1st Serve % | 50% (30/60) | 42% (28/67) |
1st Serve Win% | 73% (22/30) | 71% (20/28) |
2nd Serve Win% | 53% (16/30) | 33% (13/39) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 50% (2/4) |
Return Points W% | 51% (34/67) | 37% (22/60) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Minaur VS Przysiezny H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 7-5 |
Alex De Minaur
Player
Michal Przysiezny
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
42%
(
28 of
67)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
8
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Alex De Minaur | Michal Przysiezny |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 76% (19/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 71% (45/18) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 58% (329/242) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 75% (15/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.45 | 0 |
Aces Total | 125 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.16 | 0 |
DFs Total | 44 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:53:20 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 81.48 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 55% (964/1748) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 73% (708/964) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 57% (444/784) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 42% (86/203) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 42% (829/1964) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 80% (12/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (15/20) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 94% (17/16) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 6% (17/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 38% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Alex De Minaur Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R4 |
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Alex De Minaur
74%
(
59 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Alex De Minaur
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
48%
(
37 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
7
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
65%
(
26 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alex De Minaur
Player
Soon-Woo Kwon
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R4 |
Alexander Zverev
Player
Alex De Minaur
67%
(
77 of
115)
1st Serve %
49%
(
38 of
78)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
45 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R3 |
Alex De Minaur
Player
Alexander Bublik
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
5 of
33)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alex De Minaur
Player
Taro Daniel
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
Alex De Minaur
Player
Casper Ruud
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
74%
(
20 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Alex De Minaur
Player
Jack Draper
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 2-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Alex De Minaur
Player
Stefanos Tsitsipas
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
8
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alex De Minaur
Player
Sebastian Ofner
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Michal Przysiezny Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michal Przysiezny
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Michal Przysiezny
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Michal Przysiezny
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexander Erler
Player
Michal Przysiezny
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
14 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
41
Total Points Won
39
|
7-6(2) ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Michal Przysiezny
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-0 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michal Przysiezny
Player
Javier Barranco Cosano
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Rubber 2 | 7-5 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Brayden Schnur
Player
Michal Przysiezny
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
11
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
7
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
35 of
46)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sho Katayama
Player
Michal Przysiezny
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tobias Kamke
Player
Michal Przysiezny
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more