Alessandro Giannessi vs Roberto Quiroz Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L L L W L L
Form
L L L L L W L L L LHead-to-head: Giannessi 1 - 0 Quiroz
They have played 2 sets in total, with Giannessi winning 1 and Quiroz winning 1. The last match between Giannessi and Quiroz was at the Santo Domingo Challenger, 16-08-2022, First, Clay with Alessandro Giannessi getting the victory 1-6 5-1 ret..
Santo Domingo Challenger(16-08-2022)
1
6
5
1
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 5-1 ret. |
Stats 
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Roberto Quiroz
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
14 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
38
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats
0
H2H Matches
0
1
Sets Won
1
6
Games Won
7
1
Aces (Total)
1
1
Total Double Faults
0
1:1:48
Average Match Time
1:1:48
79% (27/34)
1st Serve %
72% (34/47)
63% (17/27)
1st Serve Win %
59% (20/34)
43% (3/7)
2nd Serve Win %
69% (9/13)
67% (2/3)
Break Points Won % (Total)
50% (2/4)
38% (18/47)
Return Points Win %
41% (14/34)
0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (1/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Alessandro Giannessi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
9
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
4 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrew Paulson
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
91%
(
31 of
34)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Dorian Juszczak
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
3-6 6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
52
Total Points Won
48
|
4-6 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
10
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Gerald Melzer
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
68%
(
74 of
109)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
109)
94
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
15
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
91%
(
39 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Alessandro Giannessi
78%
(
80 of
103)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
104)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
45 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
0-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Roberto Quiroz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Roberto Quiroz
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Roberto Quiroz
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
70
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Roberto Quiroz
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
77%
(
69 of
90)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Roberto Quiroz
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Cannon Kingsley
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Roberto Quiroz
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 5 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Roberto Quiroz
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
14 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
38
Total Points Won
43
|
1-6 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Roberto Quiroz
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
52% (458/416)
Win/Loss
54% (302/255)
51% (1038/991)
Sets Win/Loss
53% (700/612)
50% (9673/9549)
Games Win/Loss
51% (6480/6203)
44% (42/54)
Hard Win/Loss
57% (134/103)
55% (402/331)
Clay Win/Loss
54% (129/112)
32% (11/23)
Indoor Hard W/L
48% (30/33)
27% (3/8)
Grass Win/Loss
56% (9/7)
0.19
Aces Per Game
0.3
1752
Aces Total
1889
0.25
Double Faults Per Game
0.18
2315
Total Double Faults
1114
1:22:11
Average Match Time
1:16:34
536.87
Average Opponent Rank
542.11
64% (32067/50234)
1st Serve %
63% (19832/31233)
65% (20996/32067)
1st Serve Win %
69% (13758/19832)
50% (9004/18169)
2nd Serve Win %
52% (5950/11401)
41% (2051/4978)
Break Points Won % (Total)
41% (1128/2720)
39% (19695/49863)
Return Points Win %
37% (11764/31541)
40% (23/34)
Slam W/L
42% (5/7)
18% (2/9)
Masters W/L
33% (1/2)
100% (1/0)
Cups W/L
44% (7/9)
47% (50/57)
Main Tour W/L
46% (11/13)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
52% (283/258)
Challenger W/L
50% (166/164)
63% (99/58)
Futures W/L
65% (112/60)
53% (442/831)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
54% (293/545)
18% (2/11)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
75% (6/8)
49% (143/290)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
52% (114/221)
57% (171/301)
Deciding Set Win %
49% (95/192)
83% (423/351)
1st Set Won, Won Match
83% (289/240)
16% (423/66)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
17% (289/48)
22% (449/99)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
23% (268/61)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
