Prediction of Aleksandre Bakshi [484th] vs Amr Elsayed [732nd] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L W W W L
Form
W L L W L W L W W LHead-To-Head: Bakshi 2 - 0 Elsayed
They have played 4 sets in total, with Bakshi winning 4 and Elsayed winning 0. The last match between Bakshi and Elsayed was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 26-02-2025, First, Hard with Aleksandre Bakshi getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Aleksandre Bakshi | 2 |
| Amr Elsayed | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Amr Elsayed
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Amr Elsayed
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 11 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:10:19 | Average Match Time | 1:10:19 |
| 61% (60/98) | 1st Serve % | 61% (71/117) |
| 75% (45/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (44/71) |
| 68% (26/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (19/46) |
| 47% (8/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
| 46% (54/117) | Return Points Win % | 28% (27/98) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Aleksandre Bakshi vs Amr Elsayed Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bakshi 2 - 0 Elsayed
Editorial Prediction:
- Second serve performance in recent form: During the past six months, Bakshi has displayed an impressive ability to dominate their opponents on the second serve, triumphing in 51.1% of the points. Conversely, Elsayed has exhibited slightly lower proficiency in this area, securing victory in 47.86% of the second serve points. Notably, a strong correlation exists between this statistic and the accuracy of predictions regarding match outcomes.
- Recent return game statistics: Analyzing the return game statistics reveals that Bakshi, in their recent form, has been exceedingly successful in capitalizing on their opponents' vulnerability on the second serve, achieving victory in 52.3% of those points. Elsayed, on the other hand, has demonstrated even greater prowess, winning an impressive 53.21% of these crucial points. Notably, the statistical picture changes when considering first serve returns, with Bakshi standing at a respectable 30.98% success rate while Elsayed outshines them with an excellent 33.4% success rate. These statistics play a significant role in determining the favorite for this head-to-head match-up.
- Under pressure analysis: When under pressure and confronted with breakpoints, Bakshi has displayed an incredible ability to save them, rescuing themselves from unfavorable situations 56.63% of the time during their recent performances. Elsayed, while slightly less successful in this regard, has still managed to save 58.82% of breakpoints. This statistic is invaluable when making in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the course of the past year, Bakshi has enjoyed a commendable success rate, triumphing in 57.81% of the matches played (winning 37 and losing 27). Elsayed, while not far behind, has achieved a slightly lower win rate of 56.45% (winning 35 and losing 27). These figures provide us with an overall prediction overview for this head-to-head encounter.
- Playing surface proficiency: Bakshi's performance has been most exceptional on the hard surface, securing victories in an impressive 60% of the matches played on this terrain (winning 100 and losing 67). Conversely, their performance on indoor hard courts has been less impressive, with a win rate of only 38% (winning 3 and losing 5). Elsayed, on the other hand, has exhibited remarkable proficiency on hard courts, winning 56% of their matches (winning 97 and losing 75). However, their performance on indoor hard courts has been less than satisfactory, as they have failed to win a single match out of the two played. Surface proficiency plays a crucial role in determining the overall predictions for these players.
- Player level analysis: Assessing the players' performance levels over the past year reveals that Bakshi has primarily participated in tournaments held at the Futures/Satellites/ITF level with a prize money of $10K. In this arena, Bakshi has secured victories in 51.52% of the matches played (winning 17 and losing 16). Elsayed, likewise, has primarily participated in tournaments at the same level, achieving success in 58.33% of the matches (winning 35 and losing 25). When comparing the statistics to predict the favorite, it is crucial to take into account the relative event level at which each player has been competing.
- Opponent quality analysis: Examining the opponents faced by the players in the previous twelve months reveals that Bakshi has encountered opponents with an average ranking of 429.28. Elsayed, on the other hand, has faced opponents with a lower average ranking of 397. The quality of opponents faced plays a significant role in understanding the players' performance.
- Deciding set performance versus all players: For those who are interested in live predictions and betting, should this match extend to a deciding set, Bakshi has proven to be formidable in such situations. Over the past twelve months, they have emerged victorious in 56% of the deciding sets played. Elsayed, while slightly less successful, has still achieved victory in 54% of the deciding sets in all matches played on the professional tour. This statistic is particularly insightful for in-game live betting tips.
- Current event head-to-head statistics: While past player performance remains a valuable indicator in predicting tennis matches, it is vital to also consider the current event statistics, as they provide insights into players' current form. To access the event-specific statistical analysis for the players in question, kindly refer to the section below (assuming they have participated in the ongoing event). Furthermore, some players exhibit superior performance levels at specific events, a factor that should be taken into account while predicting the match outcome.
- Break point conversion: An analysis of recent performance highlights Bakshi's efficiency in converting breakpoint opportunities, with a success rate of 44.05%. Elsayed, on the other hand, has demonstrated even greater proficiency, successfully converting 47.13% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic is particularly pertinent for in-game live betting tips whenever either player finds themselves facing a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that offer predictions for tennis matches, this valuable article provides an excellent starting point for your exploration. (Warning: This content is intended for avid statistics enthusiasts).
Aleksandre Bakshi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Aleksandre Bakshi
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
11
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
95%
(
36 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
13 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
6
Aces
20
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
31 of
40)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Michal Krajci
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
51
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Niklas Schell
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
11
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moise Kouame
Player
Aleksandre Bakshi
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve %
56%
(
9 of
16)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
65%
(
11 of
17)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
24
Total Points Won
14
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Aleksandre Bakshi
65%
(
66 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
59 of
100)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
5-7 7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Filippo Moroni
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
98)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
44 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Amr Elsayed
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Aleksandre Bakshi
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
15
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
97%
(
31 of
32)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
25 of
32)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
8 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Amr Elsayed Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Amr Elsayed
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
12
Aces
14
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
88)
86
Total Points Won
99
|
1-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Preston Brown
50%
(
38 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
5
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
33 of
40)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Dennis Novak
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vadym Ursu
Player
Amr Elsayed
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Sergey Petrov
50%
(
6 of
12)
1st Serve %
40%
(
4 of
10)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
5 of
6)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
13
Total Points Won
9
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filippo Moroni
Player
Amr Elsayed
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Konstantin Zhzhenov
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
6
Aces
14
8
Double Faults
4
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
46 of
58)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michal Krajci
Player
Amr Elsayed
69%
(
68 of
98)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
6
Aces
17
1
Double Faults
8
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
31 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 6-7(1) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Amr Elsayed
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Ali Habib
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
50%
(
47 of
94)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-4 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (150/112) | Win/Loss | 53% (143/125) |
| 56% (332/257) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (324/278) |
| 52% (2843/2609) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (2994/2761) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 790 | Aces Total | 714 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 697 | Total Double Faults | 833 |
| 1:18:6 | Average Match Time | 1:18:12 |
| 454.26 | Average Opponent Rank | 444.29 |
| 61% (8800/14380) | 1st Serve % | 59% (8318/14163) |
| 68% (5991/8800) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (5667/8318) |
| 49% (2753/5580) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2931/5845) |
| 45% (672/1498) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (600/1438) |
| 41% (5900/14539) | Return Points Win % | 40% (5630/14071) |
| 58% (148/253) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (139/257) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 52% (39/75) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (30/65) |
| 56% (41/73) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (32/73) |
| 86% (155/133) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (136/120) |
| 13% (155/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (136/15) |
| 17% (107/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (132/22) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Aleksandre Bakshi
View full predicted draw for Bakshi
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
