Alejandro Gomez vs Nathaniel Lammons Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gomez vs Lammons analysis and find out who is favored!
Alejandro Gomez vs Nathaniel Lammons Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gomez has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lammons has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gomez, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lammons has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gomez has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lammons has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gomez has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lammons winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gomez has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 94/ 62), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 16/ 14). Lammons has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 50/ 32), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gomez winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gomez winning 2 and Lammons winning 0. The last match between Gomez and Lammons was at the Drummondville Challenger, 11-03-2018, Q1 round, I.hard with Alejandro Gomez getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:3:48.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gomez and Lammons have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gomez winning 0 times and Lammons 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gomez winning 0, and Lammons 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gomez has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lammons has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gomez has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lammons has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gomez has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lammons has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gomez 1 - 0 Lammons
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Ret.
Rank
352
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
591
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
58% (211-153)
Career Total W/L
54% (78-67)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$11,910
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Alejandro Gomez | Nathaniel Lammons |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 7 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 1:3:48 | 1:3:48 |
1st Serve % | 58% (35/60) | 53% (31/59) |
1st Serve Win% | 71% (25/35) | 68% (21/31) |
2nd Serve Win% | 40% (10/25) | 25% (7/28) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 40% (2/5) |
Return Points W% | 53% (31/59) | 42% (25/60) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-1 |
Alejandro Gomez
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Alejandro Gomez | Nathaniel Lammons |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Alejandro Gomez Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Gabriel Decamps
Player
Alejandro Gomez
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
5
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
5
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alejandro Gomez
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nicolas Barrientos
Player
Alejandro Gomez
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alejandro Gomez
Player
Thomas Kano
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nicolas Jarry
Player
Alejandro Gomez
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
8
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
13 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gonzalo Villanueva
Player
Alejandro Gomez
55%
(
41 of
74)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
31%
(
23 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alejandro Gomez
Player
Wilson Leite
60%
(
59 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
7
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
33%
(
13 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gilbert Klier Junior
Player
Alejandro Gomez
72%
(
68 of
95)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
4
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
Alejandro Gomez
Player
Jose Pereira
42%
(
18 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
44 of
64)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
13 of
18)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alejandro Gomez
Player
Lucas Kzam
47%
(
21 of
45)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Nathaniel Lammons Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Gijs Brouwer
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mats Rosenkranz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
18
Aces
15
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
52 of
61)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
31%
(
29 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Borna Gojo
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
70%
(
87 of
124)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
20
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
68 of
87)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
52 of
71)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
37 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
107)
119
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(2) 6-7(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Denis Istomin
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
5
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
81)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
12
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nathaniel Lammons
Player
Maxime Hamou
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
12
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ruan Roelofse
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
96%
(
23 of
24)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Julian Lenz
Player
Nathaniel Lammons
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
22 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more