Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alberto Romero De Avila Senise vs Joachim Li-ernoul Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Senise vs Li-ernoul analysis and find out who is favored!
Alberto Romero De Avila Senise vs Joachim Li-ernoul Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Senise has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Li-ernoul has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Senise, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Li-ernoul has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Senise has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Li-ernoul has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Senise has won 50% of matches played (W/L 1/ 1), with Li-ernoul winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Senise has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 108/ 92), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 35/ 37). Li-ernoul has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Senise has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1), where as Li-ernoul has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Senise has played against opponents with an average rank of 287.5 while Li-ernoul has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Senise has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Li-ernoul has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Senise has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Li-ernoul has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Senise 0 - 0 Li-ernoul
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alberto Romero De Avila Senise | Joachim Li-ernoul |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Alberto Romero De Avila Senise Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Peter Heller
Player
Alberto Romero De Avila Senise
45%
(
20 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alberto Romero De Avila Senise
Player
Mats Moraing
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
49%
(
19 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
40
Total Points Won
46
|
3-6 1-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Alberto Romero De Avila Senise
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alberto Romero De Avila Senise
Player
Luke Simkiss
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Alberto Romero De Avila Senise
77%
(
75 of
98)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Folliot
Player
Alberto Romero De Avila Senise
81%
(
50 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Alberto Romero De Avila Senise
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
43 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alberto Romero De Avila Senise
Player
Adrian Bodmer
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jakob Sude
Player
Alberto Romero De Avila Senise
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alberto Romero De Avila Senise
Player
Sergi Perez Contri
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Joachim Li-ernoul Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Hu Liu
Player
Joachim Li-Ernoul
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Xiaoyang Zhang
Player
Joachim Li-Ernoul
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Yuanfeng Li
Player
Joachim Li-Ernoul
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joachim Li-Ernoul
Player
Shenghan Zhang
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
8 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Qun Gao
Player
Joachim Li-Ernoul
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rhett Purcell
Player
Joachim Li-Ernoul
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Joachim Li-Ernoul
Player
Jiayi Li
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve %
33%
(
2 of
6)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
100%
(
3 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
10
Total Points Won
6
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tianjia Guo
Player
Joachim Li-Ernoul
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Senise Vs Li-ernoul Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
