Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros vs Nathan Ponwith Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fierros vs Ponwith analysis and find out who is favored!
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros vs Nathan Ponwith Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fierros has won 50.43% of points on his second serve, while Ponwith has won 53.85%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fierros, in recent form, has won 51.87% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ponwith has won 46.66%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.27% and 28.97% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fierros has saved 53.47% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ponwith has saved 57.42% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fierros has won 45.45% of matches played (W/L 15/ 18), with Ponwith winning 30.61% (W/L 15/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fierros has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 59/ 52), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 48% (W/L 16/ 17). Ponwith has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 36/ 24), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 36% (W/L 8/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Fierros has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 53.57% of matches (W/L 15/ 13), where as Ponwith has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 21.88% of matches (W/L 7/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Fierros winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Fierros winning 2 and Ponwith winning 0. The last match between Fierros and Ponwith was at the Morelos Challenger, 16-04-2023, Q1 round, Hard with Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:39.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fierros and Ponwith have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fierros winning 0 times and Ponwith 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Fierros winning 1, and Ponwith 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fierros has played against opponents with an average rank of 169.12 while Ponwith has played against players with an average rank of 196.76.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fierros has won 30% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ponwith has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fierros has converted 35.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ponwith has converted 36.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fierros 1 - 0 Ponwith
858
Rank
785
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
782
Rank
367
High
25
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
52% (76-70)
Career Total W/L
56% (166-131)
0% (0-4)
YTD W/L
44% (7-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros | Nathan Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:39 | 1:38:39 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (48/71) | 54% (39/72) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (34/48) | 72% (28/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (13/23) | 39% (13/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (31/72) | 34% (24/71) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-2 |
Stats 
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Nathan Ponwith
68%
(
48 of
71)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros | Nathan Ponwith |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/4) | 44% (7/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 11% (1/8) | 43% (16/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 40% (35/53) | 48% (171/185) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 50% (7/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 12 | 39 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 15 | 57 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:5 | 1:54:23 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 422.5 | 279.56 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (177/289) | 58% (681/1171) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (108/177) | 65% (442/681) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (51/112) | 54% (266/490) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (8/22) | 42% (37/89) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (103/284) | 38% (424/1123) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/4) | 44% (7/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 83% (5/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 71% (7/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (7/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
47%
(
34 of
73)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
8
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
33 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Alejandro Hernandez
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yoshihito Nishioka
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
52
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yosuke Watanuki
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valerio Aboian
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Juan Estevez
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Tomas Farjat
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
28%
(
22 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
100
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(2) 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Victor Couto Loureiro
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
13
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Roncadelli
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
0-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Franco Emanuel Egea
Player
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nathan Ponwith Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Elmar Ejupovic
47%
(
31 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alafia Ayeni
Player
Nathan Ponwith
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
15
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Samir Banerjee
Player
Nathan Ponwith
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Ezekiel Clark
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
11
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Nathan Ponwith
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
Player
Nathan Ponwith
72%
(
66 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(0) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Nathan Ponwith
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
John Echeverria
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
66%
(
27 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
40 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
104
|
5-7 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Duarte Vale
64%
(
91 of
142)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
108)
1
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
41%
(
21 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
46%
(
65 of
142)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
124
Total Points Won
126
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Fierros Vs Ponwith Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Nathan Ponwith
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
