Airi Ueda vs Lexue Xiao Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L W L
Form
W W L W W L W L L LHead To Head: Ueda 1 - 0 Xiao
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ueda winning 2 and Xiao winning 0. The last match between Ueda and Xiao was at the W50 Kofu, 17-03-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Airi Ueda getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Airi Ueda | 1 |
| Lexue Xiao | 0 |
W50 Kofu(17-03-2025)
6
1
6
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fett VS Ruzic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 |
Stats 
Airi Ueda
Player
Lexue Xiao
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:19:49 | Average Match Time | 1:19:49 |
| 76% (53/70) | 1st Serve % | 54% (28/52) |
| 57% (30/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (13/28) |
| 47% (8/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (8/24) |
| 46% (6/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 27% (3/11) |
| 60% (31/52) | Return Points Win % | 46% (32/70) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Airi Ueda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Michika Ozeki
Player
Airi Ueda
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
78%
(
32 of
41)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Airi Ueda
Player
Lexue Xiao
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 4-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Lexue Xiao Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Airi Ueda
Player
Lexue Xiao
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Meiqi Guo
Player
Lexue Xiao
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dalia Sherif
Player
Lexue Xiao
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
21 of
40)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
18 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
49
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Lexue Xiao
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lexue Xiao
Player
Ashmitha Easwaramurthi
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lexue Xiao
Player
Yashaswini Panwar
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
48%
(
29 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Monika Stankiewicz
Player
Lexue Xiao
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lexue Xiao
Player
Vanshita Pathania
56%
(
56 of
100)
1st Serve %
48%
(
49 of
103)
0
Aces
9
7
Double Faults
5
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lexue Xiao
Player
Niditra Rajmohan
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
0
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
12
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
30 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33% (2/4) | Win/Loss | 59% (20/14) |
| 33% (4/8) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (43/33) |
| 34% (32/61) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (383/348) |
| 33% (1/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (14/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) |
| 33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 1 | Aces Total | 6 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 114 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:13:45 |
| 376.17 | Average Opponent Rank | 198.59 |
| 77% (85/111) | 1st Serve % | 63% (1062/1697) |
| 49% (42/85) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (590/1062) |
| 38% (10/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (277/636) |
| 43% (6/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (123/234) |
| 48% (45/94) | Return Points Win % | 49% (838/1699) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (2/4) | Challenger W/L | 54% (7/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 62% (13/8) |
| 33% (2/6) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (20/34) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (5/8) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (18/17) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (18/1) |
| 0% (4/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (16/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
