Aidan Mayo vs Jake VAN Emburgh Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mayo vs Emburgh analysis and find out who is favored!
Aidan Mayo vs Jake VAN Emburgh Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mayo has won 48.45% of points on his second serve, while Emburgh has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mayo, in recent form, has won 51.7% of his opponent's second serve points, while Emburgh has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.66% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mayo has saved 64.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Emburgh has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mayo has won 53.62% of matches played (W/L 37/ 32), with Emburgh winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mayo has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 22/ 15), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 42% (W/L 10/ 14). Emburgh has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Mayo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.51% of matches (W/L 20/ 23), where as Emburgh has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mayo has played against opponents with an average rank of 239.97 while Emburgh has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mayo has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Emburgh has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mayo has converted 39.77% of breakpoint opportunities, and Emburgh has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mayo 0 - 0 Emburgh
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Aidan Mayo | Jake VAN Emburgh |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 18% (2/9) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 24% (6/19) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 43% (109/142) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/4) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0.37 | N/A |
Aces Total | 46 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0.31 | N/A |
DFs Total | 38 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | 1:42:47 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 240.36 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 56% (447/804) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 69% (310/447) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (176/357) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 37% (21/57) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 34% (256/753) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 33% (1/2) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 14% (1/6) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 18% (2/11) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 11% (9/1) | N/A |
Aidan Mayo Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Aidan Mayo
Player
Christian Langmo
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
53%
(
44 of
83)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
7
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Aidan Mayo
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Karue Sell
Player
Aidan Mayo
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Emilio Nava
Player
Aidan Mayo
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
70)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Aidan Mayo
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
77)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Emilio Nava
Player
Aidan Mayo
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
12
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
20 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ethan Quinn
Player
Aidan Mayo
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Blaise Bicknell
Player
Aidan Mayo
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
79)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
James Kent Trotter
Player
Aidan Mayo
49%
(
35 of
71)
1st Serve %
43%
(
26 of
61)
14
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
6
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Aidan Mayo
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
109)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
42 of
109)
99
Total Points Won
101
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Jake VAN Emburgh Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Martin Klizan
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexandros Skorilas
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
83%
(
52 of
63)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
25 of
40)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Phoenix Weir
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
27 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Timothee Andriveau
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
42 of
78)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
R1 |
Kyle Overmyer
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
66%
(
59 of
89)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Radu Mihai Papoe
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Luc Koenig
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
18 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H |
view more