Adriana Reami vs Makenna Jones Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W L W W L
Form
W L L W L L W W W LHead-To-Head: Reami 1 - 0 Jones
They have played 2 sets in total, with Reami winning 2 and Jones winning 0. The last match between Reami and Jones was at the W100 Charlottesville, 22-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Adriana Reami getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Adriana Reami | 1 |
| Makenna Jones | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W100 Charlottesville(22-04-2025)
Adriana Reami
Makenna Jones
6
3
7
5
| Reami | Stats | Jones |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (14-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 48% (15-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 812 | Ranking | 617 |
| 359 | Highest Rank | 236 |
| 27 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 4 | Titles | 3 |
| 55% (109-88) | Career Total W/L | 60% (121-81) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Nakashima VS Draper PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
20 Jun 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Opelka VS Rinderknech PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Adriana Reami
Player
Makenna Jones
70%
(
62 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
41 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:9:44 | Average Match Time | 2:9:44 |
| 70% (62/89) | 1st Serve % | 61% (39/64) |
| 63% (39/62) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (19/39) |
| 33% (9/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (10/25) |
| 75% (6/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (4/14) |
| 55% (35/64) | Return Points Win % | 46% (41/89) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Reami vs Jones Match Preview :
In recent months, the percentage of second serve points won by players is crucial in forecasting match victories. Reami has won 36% of these points, slightly trailing Jones, who has secured 37.18%. This difference, though minimal, could influence the match outcome.
The efficiency in returning games also plays a pivotal role in determining match success. Reami has achieved a win rate of 51.82% against opponents' second serves, while Jones has capitalized on 55.1%. Analyzing first serve return statistics, Reami's performance stands at 30.86%, whereas Jones leads with 36.74%. This discrepancy suggests that Jones may have the upper hand based on return proficiency.
Assessing performances under pressure, particularly in saving breakpoints, Jones appears more resilient. Recent data indicates Jones has saved 49.73% of breakpoints, surpassing Reami’s 44.23%, making Jones more reliable during critical moments of a match.
Over the past year, match win percentages offer insight into overall consistency and form. Reami has secured a win rate of 42.86% with a record of 15 wins to 20 losses. Conversely, Jones boasts a higher success rate, winning 53.85% of matches, detailed as 21 wins and 18 losses.
Surface performances reveal strategic preferences, with Reami excelling on hard courts at a 61% win rate, while clay poses challenges at 44%. Jones, however, shows prowess on clay with a 62% win rate but finds indoor hard courts less favorable at 50%.
The tournament level also impacts statistical relevance, with Reami predominantly competing in Challengers/ITF tournaments, achieving the same overall win percentage of 42.86%. Differently, Jones has a slightly better win rate of 52.94% at similar event levels.
The average ranking of opponents faced in the last year adds another layer of analysis. Reami typically contends against players ranked 482.49 on average, while Jones faces stronger competition, with an average rank of 358.69.
In matches decided in a final set, Jones holds a distinct advantage, having won 73% of such instances. Reami, in comparison, has managed only a 38% success rate in deciding sets.
When converting breakpoint opportunities into game victories, Jones again shows superior form, converting 43.75% of break points compared to Reami's 35.59%.
Using the accumulated data and comparative analysis, Jones clearly emerges as the predicted winner in the upcoming match, given their superior performance statistics in key areas.
Reami vs Jones Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Adriana Reami Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Sara Daavettila
Player
Adriana Reami
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
48%
(
36 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
2-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adriana Reami
Player
Luiza Fullana
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 2-6 2-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adriana Reami
Player
Tiziana Rossini
91%
(
48 of
53)
1st Serve %
82%
(
32 of
39)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Bosio
Player
Adriana Reami
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Adriana Reami
Player
Gabriella Broadfoot
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adriana Reami
Player
Luiza Fullana
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adriana Reami
Player
Maria Camila Torres Murcia
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve %
85%
(
28 of
33)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
13 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
47
Total Points Won
23
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Haley Giavara
Player
Adriana Reami
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Makenna Jones Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Angela Fita Boluda
Player
Makenna Jones
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
49
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Makenna Jones
Player
Alina Korneeva
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
11
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
26%
(
9 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
54%
(
55 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Makenna Jones
Player
Malene Helgo
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
42 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Makenna Jones
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
0
Aces
7
16
Double Faults
12
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
41 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ekaterine Gorgodze
Player
Makenna Jones
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve %
71%
(
27 of
38)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bella Payne
Player
Makenna Jones
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
10
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Makenna Jones
Player
Katerina Shabashkevich
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gergana Topalova
Player
Makenna Jones
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (109/88) | Win/Loss | 60% (121/81) |
| 54% (244/207) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (263/192) |
| 52% (2248/2050) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2235/1969) |
| 62% (77/48) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (60/39) |
| 44% (31/39) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (58/39) |
| 50% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 244 | Aces Total | 55 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.41 |
| 437 | Total Double Faults | 838 |
| 1:25:46 | Average Match Time | 1:28:45 |
| 445.49 | Average Opponent Rank | 444.47 |
| 65% (7169/10994) | 1st Serve % | 65% (7392/11419) |
| 60% (4314/7169) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (4359/7392) |
| 46% (1763/3825) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (1682/4027) |
| 50% (661/1318) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (751/1538) |
| 46% (5059/10946) | Return Points Win % | 48% (5344/11037) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 51% (87/85) | Challenger W/L | 57% (87/66) |
| 88% (22/3) | Futures W/L | 72% (34/13) |
| 55% (107/194) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (119/198) |
| 48% (20/42) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (29/52) |
| 53% (32/60) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (33/56) |
| 89% (105/93) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (109/99) |
| 10% (105/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (109/10) |
| 16% (92/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (93/22) |
Reami vs. Jones Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
