Adrian Oetzbach vs Saba George Nanobashvili Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L L W W L
Form
L W L W L L L L W LHead To Head: Oetzbach 1 - 0 Nanobashvili
They have played 2 sets in total, with Oetzbach winning 2 and Nanobashvili winning 0. The last match between Oetzbach and Nanobashvili was at the M15 Bastad, 14-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Adrian Oetzbach getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Adrian Oetzbach | 1 |
| Saba George Nanobashvili | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Bastad(14-05-2025)
Adrian Oetzbach
Saba George Nanobashvili
6
3
6
4
| Oetzbach | Stats | Nanobashvili |
|---|---|---|
| 57% (21-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 38% (5-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 652 | Ranking | N/A |
| 502 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 27 | Age | 20 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 55% (255-211) | Career Total W/L | 47% (29-33) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Alves VS Meza PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
23 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bergs VS Fonseca PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Oetzbach VS Nanobashvili H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Saba George Nanobashvili
43%
(
28 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Oetzbach VS Nanobashvili H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:39:15 | Average Match Time | 1:39:15 |
| 43% (28/65) | 1st Serve % | 63% (41/65) |
| 86% (24/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (29/41) |
| 54% (20/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (6/24) |
| 38% (3/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
| 46% (30/65) | Return Points Win % | 32% (21/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Oetzbach vs Nanobashvili Match Preview :
- Second serve performance: Recently, Nanobashvili has won 38.89% of their second serve points compared to Oetzbach's 43.18%. Does this give Oetzbach an edge in serving consistency? Yes, it appears so.
- Return game stats: Nanobashvili has shown superior performance, winning 63.64% of second serve return points, versus Oetzbach's 48.35%. Could this return game advantage tilt the match in Nanobashvili's favor? Probably, given its importance.
- First serve returns are nearly identical: Nanobashvili stands at 28.57%, while Oetzbach is at 29.04%. Therefore, neither player has a significant edge in returning first serves.
- Under pressure situations: Oetzbach has been more effective, saving 54.96% of breakpoints compared to Nanobashvili's 46.15%. This could be crucial in high-stakes situations.
- Overall performance: Over the past year, Nanobashvili has a slight winning edge at 53.33% of matches, closely followed by Oetzbach at 51.52%.
- Surface preference: Both players excel on Hard courts, with Nanobashvili winning 57% and Oetzbach 59% of their matches on this surface.
- Event level and player experience: Both compete chiefly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with respective winning percentages of 53.33% for Nanobashvili and 54% for Oetzbach.
- Quality of opponents: Nanobashvili faced higher-ranked competitors, with an average opponent rank of 108.37, whereas Oetzbach's opponents average 353.02. Does playing tougher opponents mean Nanobashvili is better prepared? Quite possibly.
- Deciding set performance: When the match goes the distance, Oetzbach holds a slight edge, winning 67% of deciding sets to Nanobashvili's 63%.
- Break point conversion: Nanobashvili has a slight advantage, converting 42.86% of breakpoints, compared to Oetzbach's 41.67%.
Editorial Prediction (May 14, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match presents an intriguing face-off between Nanobashvili and Oetzbach, with both showing strong areas in recent statistics. Oetzbach seems to have an edge with a more reliable second serve and better breakpoint saving ability, indicating resilience under pressure.
However, Nanobashvili counters these strengths with superior return game stats and a slightly better performance against higher-ranked opponents, which could suggest better adaptability in challenging scenarios.
When considering the overall statistics and respective strengths, while Oetzbach might have slight advantages in serving and deciding set situations, Nanobashvili's edge in return games could prove decisive. Given these dynamics, Nanobashvili appears to have a marginally better chance of winning the upcoming match.
Oetzbach vs Nanobashvili Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Adrian Oetzbach Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Jonas Pelle Hartenstein
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Emilien Voisin
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giorgio Tabacco
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
104)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Manuel Mazza
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
67)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Andrea Paolini
52%
(
46 of
89)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Filippo Francesco Garbero
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
94
Total Points Won
70
|
5-7 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Antonio Caruso
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
54%
(
19 of
35)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Saba George Nanobashvili Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Noel Larwig
Player
Saba George Nanobashvili
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-2 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Saba George Nanobashvili
Player
Daniel Margoulis
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve %
58%
(
14 of
24)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
60%
(
9 of
15)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
11 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
25
Total Points Won
21
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 1-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Saba George Nanobashvili
43%
(
28 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 1-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 ret. | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (255/211) | Win/Loss | 47% (29/33) |
| 54% (571/489) | Sets Win/Loss | 47% (66/74) |
| 52% (5185/4763) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (668/707) |
| 59% (71/50) | Hard Win/Loss | 57% (17/13) |
| 55% (167/134) | Clay Win/Loss | 35% (9/17) |
| 40% (17/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (3/3) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 699 | Aces Total | 58 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1028 | Total Double Faults | 152 |
| 1:9:23 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 350.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 142.79 |
| 62% (12153/19451) | 1st Serve % | 59% (1359/2291) |
| 65% (7873/12153) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (837/1359) |
| 47% (3432/7297) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (389/932) |
| 43% (907/2125) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (106/212) |
| 42% (8285/19853) | Return Points Win % | 42% (902/2124) |
| 34% (10/19) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (245/192) | Futures W/L | 47% (29/33) |
| 55% (251/460) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (29/61) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (46/92) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (7/13) |
| 52% (68/132) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (9/17) |
| 86% (256/220) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 77% (31/24) |
| 14% (256/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 23% (31/7) |
| 17% (210/35) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (31/5) |
Oetzbach vs. Nanobashvili Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
