Adrian Oetzbach vs Benjamin Hannestad Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Jul at 12:01 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Oetzbach vs B. Hannestad

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

DEN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Oetzbach 1 - 0 Hannestad
They have played 3 sets in total, with Adrian Oetzbach winning 2 and Benjamin Hannestad winning 1. The last match between Adrian Oetzbach and Benjamin Hannestad was at the M15 Uslar, 17-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Adrian Oetzbach getting the victory 6-7(2) 7-6(9) 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Oetzbach | 1 |
| Hannestad | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Uslar(07-17-25)
A. Oetzbach vs B. Hannestad H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.03% (279-228) | Career Total W/L | 57.78% (104-76) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Oetzbach vs B. Hannestad Match Preview:
- Hannestad slightly outperforms Oetzbach on second serve points, securing 43.69% compared to Oetzbach's 41.98%. Could this edge be pivotal in their match?
- When it comes to returning, Hannestad has a higher success rate, winning 48.47% of opponents' second serve points versus Oetzbach's 46.03%. On first serve returns, Hannestad maintains a lead with 34.32%, besting Oetzbach's 29.86%.
- Under pressure, Oetzbach excels in saving breakpoints with a 52.81% save rate, surpassing Hannestad's 35%.
- Looking at match outcomes over the past year, Hannestad has a superior win percentage of 67.31% compared to Oetzbach’s 50%.
- Examining surface preferences, Hannestad’s best performances are on clay, with a 61% win rate, while Oetzbach favors hard courts, achieving a 59% win rate.
- Both players primarily compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Hannestad boasting a 67.31% success rate over the past year against Oetzbach’s 52.83%.
- Hannestad faces stronger opponents, with an average rank of 228.12 compared to Oetzbach’s average opponent rank of 366.3.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Hannestad has historically won 67% of such cases compared to Oetzbach’s 61% win rate.
- Hannestad leads in breakpoint conversion, capitalizing on 46.91% of opportunities, while Oetzbach converts 34.39%.
Editorial Prediction (July 17, 2025, UTC):
In a head-to-head comparison, Hannestad consistently demonstrates stronger performance than Oetzbach across various match statistics. He edges out Oetzbach on second serve points and return games, crucial areas that could influence the match outcome significantly.
Despite Oetzbach's ability to save breakpoints effectively, Hannestad’s overall performance in deciding sets and his experience against higher-ranked opponents indicate a higher level of match preparedness. His ability to convert breakpoints also adds to his competitive advantage.
Given these factors, Hannestad appears to be the stronger contender for the upcoming match. Based on recent performances and statistical insights, Hannestad is the probable favorite to win this tennis match.
Adrian Oetzbach vs Benjamin Hannestad Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Oetzbach vs B. Hannestad H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 15 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:52:19 | Average Match Time | 2:52:19 |
| 64% (74/115) | 1st Serve % | 75% (83/110) |
| 68% (50/74) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (50/83) |
| 51% (21/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (13/27) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
| 43% (47/110) | Return Points Win % | 38% (44/115) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Oetzbach Recent Matches Played
B. Hannestad Recent Matches Played

A. Oetzbach vs B. Hannestad Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.03% (279/228) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.78% (104/76) |
| 54.13% (623/528) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.96% (225/170) |
| 52.18% (5649/5176) | Games Win/Loss | 53.91% (1958/1674) |
| 57.81% (74/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.45% (54/40) |
| 56.19% (186/145) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.81% (37/27) |
| 40.43% (19/28) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59.09% (13/9) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 797 | Aces Total | 157 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1125 | Total Double Faults | 301 |
| 1:12:14 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 361.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 324.51 |
| 63% (13775/22033) | 1st Serve % | 63% (3762/5945) |
| 65% (8966/13775) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (2341/3762) |
| 48% (3949/8257) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1005/2183) |
| 42% (1024/2421) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (297/674) |
| 42% (9356/22466) | Return Points Win % | 43% (2461/5733) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 33.33% (11/22) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 56.54% (268/206) | Futures W/L | 58.86% (103/72) |
| 55% (274/500) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (101/172) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 48% (51/106) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (25/45) |
| 51% (73/142) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (22/41) |
| 87% (277/240) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (104/92) |
| 13% (277/37) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (104/10) |
| 17% (230/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (76/13) |