Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras vs Jurgen Zopp Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Menendez-Maceiras vs Zopp analysis and find out who is favored!
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras vs Jurgen Zopp Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Menendez-Maceiras has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Zopp has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Menendez-Maceiras, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zopp has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Menendez-Maceiras has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zopp has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Menendez-Maceiras has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Zopp winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Menendez-Maceiras has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 319/ 210), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 14/ 23). Zopp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 130/ 67), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 13/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Menendez-Maceiras has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Zopp has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Menendez-Maceiras winning 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Menendez-Maceiras winning 1 and Zopp winning 4. The last match between Menendez-Maceiras and Zopp was at the Quimper Challenger, 31-01-2019, Third, I.hard with Jurgen Zopp getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:19:37.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Menendez-Maceiras and Zopp have played a deciding set 1 times, with Menendez-Maceiras winning 0 times and Zopp 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Menendez-Maceiras winning 1, and Zopp 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Menendez-Maceiras has played against opponents with an average rank of 144 while Zopp has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Menendez-Maceiras has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zopp has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Menendez-Maceiras has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zopp has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Menendez-Maceiras 0 - 2 Zopp
865
Rank
111
High
38
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
884
Rank
71
High
36
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
55% (608-500)
Career Total W/L
60% (430-285)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$504,829
Career Prize Money
$452,796
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Menendez-Maceiras VS Zopp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Adrian Menendez-Maceiras | Jurgen Zopp |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 4 |
| Games Won | 22 | 32 |
| Aces (Total) | 9 | 19 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:19:37 | 2:19:37 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (122/196) | 64% (115/179) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (81/122) | 77% (88/115) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (36/74) | 59% (38/64) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 17% (1/6) | 43% (6/14) |
| Return Points W% | 30% (53/179) | 40% (79/196) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Menendez-Maceiras VS Zopp H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Jurgen Zopp
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
14
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| 6-7(14) 7-6(5) 6-1 |
Stats
Jurgen Zopp
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
62%
(
74 of
119)
1st Serve %
63%
(
83 of
131)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
56 of
83)
62%
(
28 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
36 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
51 of
131)
134
Total Points Won
116
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Adrian Menendez-Maceiras | Jurgen Zopp |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
51%
(
62 of
121)
1st Serve %
56%
(
65 of
116)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
59%
(
35 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
41 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
42 of
116)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Daniil Glinka
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
3
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Skander Mansouri
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
0
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Ben Jones
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
43%
(
20 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Matthew William Donald
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Jurgen Zopp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Karlis Ozolins
Player
Jurgen Zopp
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lewie Lane
Player
Jurgen Zopp
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
24 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-7(3) 6-4 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thiago Agustin Tirante
Player
Jurgen Zopp
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
55 of
83)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
6-7(4) 7-5 10-6 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Jurgen Zopp
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Artem Smirnov
Player
Jurgen Zopp
45%
(
21 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jurgen Zopp
Player
Vladimir Ivanov
47%
(
25 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Jurgen Zopp
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
13 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
17 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurgen Zopp
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
18 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
20 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Menendez-Maceiras Vs Zopp Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
