Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras vs Daniel Brands Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Menendez-Maceiras vs Brands analysis and find out who is favored!
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras vs Daniel Brands Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Menendez-Maceiras has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Brands has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Menendez-Maceiras, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Brands has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Menendez-Maceiras has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brands has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Menendez-Maceiras has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Brands winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Menendez-Maceiras has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 319/ 210), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 14/ 23). Brands has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 112/ 85), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 165/ 141).
- Player level: In the last year, Menendez-Maceiras has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Brands has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Menendez-Maceiras winning 2 times. They have played 13 sets in total, with Menendez-Maceiras winning 5 and Brands winning 8. The last match between Menendez-Maceiras and Brands was at the Recanati Challenger, 08-07-2018, Final, Hard with Daniel Brands getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:4.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Menendez-Maceiras and Brands have played a deciding set 3 times, with Menendez-Maceiras winning 2 times and Brands 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Menendez-Maceiras winning 1, and Brands 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Menendez-Maceiras has played against opponents with an average rank of 144 while Brands has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Menendez-Maceiras has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brands has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Menendez-Maceiras has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brands has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Menendez-Maceiras 2 - 3 Brands
865
Rank
111
High
38
Age
R
Plays
2
Total3
2
Hard1
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
Ret.
Rank
51
High
36
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
55% (608-500)
Career Total W/L
56% (482-380)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$504,829
Career Prize Money
$765,635
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Menendez-Maceiras VS Brands H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Adrian Menendez-Maceiras | Daniel Brands |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 8 |
| Games Won | 60 | 69 |
| Aces (Total) | 23 | 57 |
| DFs (Total) | 11 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:4 | 1:14:4 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (185/284) | 69% (210/306) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (129/185) | 80% (168/210) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 62% (61/99) | 55% (53/96) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 16% (3/19) | 45% (9/20) |
| Return Points W% | 28% (85/306) | 33% (94/284) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 60% (5/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (5/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 40% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Menendez-Maceiras VS Brands H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Daniel Brands
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
11
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
93%
(
37 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
13 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 6-3 4-6 7-5 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
81%
(
72 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
16
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
8
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
26%
(
23 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 3-6 7-6(7) 6-4 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Daniel Brands
59%
(
51 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
67 of
105)
7
Aces
23
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
49 of
67)
69%
(
24 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
26%
(
22 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
34 of
105)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| 5-7 6-2 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Adrian Menendez-Maceiras | Daniel Brands |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
51%
(
62 of
121)
1st Serve %
56%
(
65 of
116)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
59%
(
35 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
41 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
42 of
116)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Daniil Glinka
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
3
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Skander Mansouri
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
0
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Ben Jones
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
43%
(
20 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Matthew William Donald
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Brands Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Soon-Woo Kwon
Player
Daniel Brands
64%
(
72 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
75 of
118)
18
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
58 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
36 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
58 of
118)
134
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Blaz Rola
66%
(
93 of
140)
1st Serve %
73%
(
80 of
109)
16
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
73 of
93)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
61 of
80)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
34%
(
47 of
140)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
30 of
109)
123
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(5) 7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Mark Whitehouse
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Daniel Brands
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Alex Bolt
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Feliciano Lopez
Player
Daniel Brands
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
76%
(
67 of
88)
20
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Ryan Peniston
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Daniel Brands
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Daniel Brands
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Daniel Brands
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Menendez-Maceiras Vs Brands Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
