Adrian Menendez-Maceiras vs Arthur De Greef Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Head-To-Head
2 - 0
55% (608-500)
Career Total W/L
60% (372-251)
0% (0-0)
Win/Loss
0% (0-0)
$504,829
Career Prize Money
$140,200
0
YTD Titles
0
Menendez-Maceiras VS Greef H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Arthur De Greef
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 3-1 ret. |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Arthur De Greef
80%
(
8 of
10)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
7 of
8)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
15
Total Points Won
9
|
||||
Menendez-Maceiras VS Greef H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Adrian Menendez-Maceiras | Arthur De Greef |
|---|---|---|
| H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 0 |
| Games Won | 15 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 7 |
| Total Double Faults | 0 | 2 |
| Average Match Time | 0:42:52 | 0:42:52 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (43/61) | 59% (48/81) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 84% (36/43) | 63% (30/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 72% (13/18) | 55% (18/33) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points Win % | 41% (33/81) | 20% (12/61) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
51%
(
62 of
121)
1st Serve %
56%
(
65 of
116)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
59%
(
35 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
41 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
42 of
116)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Daniil Glinka
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
3
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Skander Mansouri
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
0
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Ben Jones
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
43%
(
20 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Matthew William Donald
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Arthur De Greef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Arthur De Greef
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Malek Jaziri
Player
Arthur De Greef
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur De Greef
Player
Vit Kopriva
45%
(
23 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petr Nouza
Player
Arthur De Greef
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tommy Robredo
Player
Arthur De Greef
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Arthur De Greef
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Adrian Menendez-Maceiras | Arthur De Greef |
|---|---|---|
| Win/Loss | 55% (608/500) | 60% (372/251) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1386/1213) | 58% (824/595) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (12784/12211) | 53% (7022/6316) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (319/210) | 51% (27/26) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 53% (227/200) | 63% (318/190) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (48/67) | 45% (26/32) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 38% (14/23) | 25% (1/3) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.23 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 2854 | 1099 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 | 0.14 |
| Total Double Faults | 1317 | 904 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Average Opponent Rank | 139.15 | 595.87 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (28852/47333) | 58% (14002/24035) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 70% (20129/28852) | 67% (9397/14002) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (9465/18481) | 49% (4913/10033) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1750/4361) | 42% (1047/2493) |
| Return Points Win % | 38% (18132/47633) | 41% (9746/23974) |
| Slam W/L | 48% (39/42) | 35% (8/15) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (4/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 46% (42/49) | 55% (11/9) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (354/308) | 52% (145/133) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (169/93) | 69% (208/92) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (587/1078) | 60% (358/595) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 47% (7/15) | 43% (3/7) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (212/417) | 59% (110/187) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 53% (201/381) | 52% (96/185) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (578/479) | 87% (365/319) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (578/98) | 13% (365/46) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (529/124) | 20% (258/52) |
See recent tennis photos of Menendez-Maceiras and Greef
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
