Adrian Mannarino vs Naoki Nakagawa Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L L L L L L L
Form
W W W L W L L W L LH2H: Mannarino 1 - 0 Nakagawa
They have played 3 sets in total, with Mannarino winning 2 and Nakagawa winning 1. The last match between Mannarino and Nakagawa was at the US Men's Clay Court Championship - Houston, 29-03-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Adrian Mannarino getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Adrian Mannarino | 1 |
| Naoki Nakagawa | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: US Men's Clay Court Championship - Houston(29-03-2025)
Adrian Mannarino
Naoki Nakagawa
3
6
6
3
6
2
| Mannarino | Stats | Nakagawa |
|---|---|---|
| 25% (7-21) | YTD Win/Loss | 40% (6-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 129 | Ranking | 354 |
| 17 | Highest Rank | 334 |
| 36 | Age | 28 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 25 | Titles | 6 |
| 55% (680-566) | Career Total W/L | 60% (325-214) |
| $6,988,870 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Machac VS Halys PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kasatkina VS Siniakova PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
4
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 11 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:4:57 | Average Match Time | 2:4:57 |
| 62% (50/81) | 1st Serve % | 57% (47/83) |
| 74% (37/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (35/47) |
| 58% (18/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (16/36) |
| 30% (3/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 14% (1/7) |
| 39% (32/83) | Return Points Win % | 32% (26/81) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mannarino vs Nakagawa Match Preview :
What happens when second serve percentages are almost identical? Looking at the recent form over the past six months, Mannarino boasts a 47.87% success rate on his second serve, slightly behind Nakagawa's 47.97%. This subtle difference might seem trivial, yet it is an important indicator of match outcomes. Both players seem evenly matched in this area. But does Nakagawa’s slight edge grant him the upper hand when it comes to predictions?
Shifting focus to return games, Mannarino emerges with a slight superiority, having recently captured 46.12% of points from his opponents’ second serves, compared to Nakagawa’s 43.36%. For first serve returns, Nakagawa narrowly leads with a 24.92% capture rate against Mannarino’s 24.12%. In a head-to-head scenario, these figures become crucial. Could Mannarino’s slight downturn in second-serve returns tilt any live predictions in Nakagawa’s favor?
The heat intensifies when breakpoints and pressure moments arise. Mannarino's efficiency at salvaging 53.61% of breakpoints reveals a composure that Nakagawa, at 50%, cannot quite match. Although Mannarino displays resilience here, remember that Nakagawa's ability to consistently bounce back also speaks volumes. In match predictions, who will better manage the pressure cooker moments on the court?
Over the last year, the stark contrast in overall match outcomes is telling. Mannarino has managed to win just 25% of his matches (W/L 12/36), whereas Nakagawa shines with a 60.42% win rate (W/L 29/19). Clearly, Nakagawa's recent track record suggests greater consistency and success. Will Mannarino's experience against stronger opposition be a key factor in this head-to-head duel?
Both players have distinct surface strengths. Mannarino is adept on grass with a career win rate of 59%, revealing a preference for fast surfaces. Conversely, Nakagawa excels on indoor hard courts at 61%. Yet, both struggle on clay, introducing another layer to the analysis. How do these surface preferences weigh into today's face-off?
From a competitive level standpoint, Mannarino’s exposure mostly on the Main tour versus Nakagawa’s presence at Challenge/ITF tournaments reflects on their match statistics. With Mannarino facing stronger foes and Nakagawa prevailing in more matches albeit at a lower tier, this disparity offers contrasting narratives for match-fetching predictions. Does Mannarino’s tour-level exposure tip the scale in his favor, or does the hunger for success by Nakagawa at lower levels prevail?
A glance at opponent quality reveals Mannarino’s average opponent ranks 128.67 in contrast to Nakagawa's average of 431.85. Nakagawa clearly has faced lower-tier opponents, suggesting Mannarino might be more battle-hardened. In a potential tight contest, could this experience against elite competition favor Mannarino's chances?
Deciding sets become crucial in matches that hang in balance. Nakagawa's enviable 64% success in deciding sets dwarfs Mannarino's 39% over the last year, translating into potential dominance if this match goes the distance. If this match sails into a deciding set, does Nakagawa’s prowess and past record almost preordain his success?
Break point conversion rates spark intrigue. Mannarino converts 33.33% of his break chances, outperforming Nakagawa’s 28.71%. This conversion advantage becomes a strategic asset during critical junctures. Will Mannarino's execution on break points prove decisive?
Weaving through this statistical tapestry, trends emerge. Mannarino’s grit and exposure to high-level competition clash with Nakagawa’s recent winning form and tenacity in tight finishes. While Nakagawa's head-to-head form impresses, Mannarino's seasoned campaign at the higher echelon might ultimately bestow him the slightest edge in this riveting encounter. Then again, never underestimate the unpredictability of tennis. Could this be Nakagawa’s moment to upend expectations? At the event’s climax, all eyes will be on the court for the fireworks.
Mannarino vs Nakagawa Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Adrian Mannarino Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Adrian Mannarino
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gonzalo Bueno
Player
Adrian Mannarino
72%
(
74 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
107)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
56 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
97
|
6-2 6-7(9) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Adrian Mannarino
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 0-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vitaliy Sachko
Player
Adrian Mannarino
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Adrian Mannarino
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Adrian Mannarino
69%
(
69 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Adrian Mannarino
43%
(
36 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
53 of
77)
10
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
51%
(
24 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
29 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Bernard Tomic
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
41%
(
33 of
80)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
65
|
5-7 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Naoki Nakagawa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
46%
(
30 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
12
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
34 of
42)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
14 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sanhui Shin
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
51%
(
47 of
92)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Mannarino
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
4
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Taiyo Yamanaka
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
42%
(
27 of
65)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Rannmaru Kozuma
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
8
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Christian Langmo
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
68%
(
57 of
84)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
13
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
21 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naoki Nakagawa
Player
Ajeet Rai
44%
(
30 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (680/566) | Win/Loss | 60% (325/214) |
| 53% (1609/1423) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (725/535) |
| 51% (14752/14133) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (6287/5715) |
| 57% (270/204) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (193/126) |
| 38% (80/132) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (112/75) |
| 59% (236/166) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61% (20/13) |
| 59% (94/64) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
| 4474 | Aces Total | 1856 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 2364 | Total Double Faults | 1072 |
| 1:16:5 | Average Match Time | 1:19:54 |
| 485.43 | Average Opponent Rank | 465.09 |
| 60% (43333/71975) | 1st Serve % | 57% (15996/28069) |
| 70% (30301/43333) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (11103/15996) |
| 51% (14749/28642) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6070/12073) |
| 42% (2723/6486) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1166/2769) |
| 38% (27390/72361) | Return Points Win % | 39% (11119/28177) |
| 48% (64/69) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41% (73/103) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 80% (8/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (234/224) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 64% (200/114) | Challenger W/L | 46% (63/75) |
| 65% (101/54) | Futures W/L | 66% (262/136) |
| 56% (626/1127) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (321/533) |
| 45% (50/112) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 49% (209/423) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (99/175) |
| 52% (203/388) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (106/182) |
| 84% (657/552) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (296/259) |
| 16% (657/103) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (296/37) |
| 21% (588/124) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (243/66) |
Mannarino vs. Nakagawa Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
