N. Kicker
To Win
A. D. Vallejo
To Win
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Santiago Rodriguez Taverna Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L L W W W L
Form
W L W W L L W W L LHead-To-Head: Vallejo 2 - 0 Taverna
They have played 5 sets in total, with Vallejo winning 4 and Taverna winning 1. The last match between Vallejo and Taverna was at the Asuncion Challenger, 18-03-2025, First, Clay with Adolfo Daniel Vallejo getting the victory 6-3 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Adolfo Daniel Vallejo | 2 |
| Santiago Rodriguez Taverna | 0 |
Asuncion Challenger(18-03-2025)
| Vallejo | Stats | Taverna |
|---|---|---|
| 60% (15-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (11-10) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 187 | Ranking | 310 |
| 187 | Highest Rank | 157 |
| 20 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 3 | Titles | 7 |
| 56% (104-83) | Career Total W/L | 58% (327-234) |
| $72,000 | Career Prize Money | $128,000 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Monfils VS Korda PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
25 Mar 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Linette VS Paolini PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
26 Mar 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| 5-7 7-6(4) 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 31 | Games Won | 24 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:56:50 | Average Match Time | 0:56:50 |
| 68% (45/66) | 1st Serve % | 51% (38/75) |
| 76% (34/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (21/38) |
| 43% (9/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (22/37) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 43% (32/75) | Return Points Win % | 35% (23/66) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo vs Santiago Rodriguez Taverna Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Adolfo Daniel Vallejo 2 - 0 Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Analyzing the upcoming tennis match between Vallejo and Taverna, recent performance metrics on the second serve depict that Vallejo has captured 43.94% of points, whereas Taverna slightly edges ahead with 44.99%. This stat maintains a strong correlation with predicting match outcomes and offers insight into their respective competitive advantages.
When evaluating their return games over the last six months, Vallejo has won 44.91% of their opponent's second serve points, marginally leading Taverna, who stands at 44.9%. A slight edge is also discernable in the first serve return statistics, where Vallejo outperforms with 33.95% compared to Taverna's 30.31%, suggesting potential predictive accuracy in head-to-head matchups.
Examining performance under pressure, Taverna exhibits superior breakpoint resilience by saving 54.55% of breakpoints against him, surpassing Vallejo, who saves 51.08%. Such a stat is valuable for making in-game predictions, particularly during high-pressure situations.
Looking at an overall performance summary, Vallejo has recorded a match win rate of 56.34% (W/L 40/31) over the past year, indicating better form compared to Taverna's 50.7% (W/L 36/35). This suggests a slight predictive edge for Vallejo when overall recent play is considered.
Both players boast their best career surface win percentage on hard courts, with Taverna holding a superior win rate of 63% (W/L 92/54) relative to Vallejo's 58% (W/L 31/22). However, indoor hard courts present challenges, reflected in Vallejo's 40% (W/L 2/3) and Taverna’s 25% (W/L 1/3) win rates.
On comparing their experiences over the last twelve months, Vallejo has faced opponents with a higher average ranking of 297.04 compared to Taverna’s 357.55, implying Vallejo's ability to play competitively against stronger opposition.
Upon examining head-to-head encounters, Vallejo boasts a win against Taverna in their sole three-set clash, with the last clash at the M 25 Punta del Este seeing Vallejo clinch victory with a score of 5-7, 7-6(4), 6-2. During intense match moments, Vallejo further demonstrated composure by winning the tiebreak played against Taverna.
In terms of track record in deciding sets across all tours, Taverna appears more adept with a 61% win rate compared to Vallejo's 52%, presenting a critical insight should the match stretch to a deciding set.
Predicated on these statistics, Vallejo seems to hold a slight favor in the upcoming duel. Historical results, alongside incremental leads in pivotal performance metrics, position Vallejo as the opener's likely victor.
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Franco Roncadelli
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
109)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
47 of
60)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
38 of
109)
113
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| SF | 5-7 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
75)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Cigarran
Player
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
63%
(
77 of
123)
1st Serve %
69%
(
92 of
133)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
7
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
61 of
92)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
37%
(
45 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
51 of
133)
129
Total Points Won
127
|
7-5 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Player
Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo
59%
(
65 of
110)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
42 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
106)
116
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Player
Alvaro Frutos Alonso
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve %
41%
(
15 of
37)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
16 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
41
Total Points Won
34
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
84%
(
85 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
38 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
85)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Player
Tomas Rengel Sierra
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Player
Alex Barrena
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Renzo Olivo
Player
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
23 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
Player
Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (104/83) | Win/Loss | 58% (327/234) |
| 55% (236/197) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (731/594) |
| 52% (2060/1915) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (6525/6148) |
| 58% (31/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (92/54) |
| 55% (71/58) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (233/176) |
| 40% (2/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 269 | Aces Total | 1433 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 588 | Total Double Faults | 1336 |
| 1:44:19 | Average Match Time | 1:41:23 |
| 387.59 | Average Opponent Rank | 421.83 |
| 62% (7468/12069) | 1st Serve % | 62% (23069/37335) |
| 63% (4693/7468) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (15288/23069) |
| 49% (2270/4600) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7044/14266) |
| 45% (646/1439) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1620/3920) |
| 43% (5281/12148) | Return Points Win % | 41% (15127/37253) |
| 50% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 54% (7/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (3/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (44/48) | Challenger W/L | 51% (108/102) |
| 64% (56/31) | Futures W/L | 63% (212/124) |
| 56% (102/183) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (320/551) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 57% (4/7) |
| 37% (14/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (95/177) |
| 54% (30/56) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (121/198) |
| 84% (104/87) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (300/263) |
| 15% (104/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (300/36) |
| 20% (83/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (261/62) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
