A. D. Vallejo
To Win
S. R. Taverna
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W L W L LForm
W L W L L W L L L LThey have played 2 sets in total, with Vallejo winning 2 and Carou winning 0. The last match between Vallejo and Carou was at the M25 Punta del Este, 14-02-2025, Second, Clay with Adolfo Daniel Vallejo getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
M25 Punta del Este(14-02-2025)
17 Mar 2025 / First
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 7-5 |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
As we anticipate the forthcoming tennis match, there are several key factors that can help us make an informed prediction. By analyzing the recent performances of the players, we can gain valuable insights into their second serve performance, return game stats, and ability to handle pressure situations.
Examining the second serve performance over the past six months, Vallejo has displayed exceptional consistency, winning an impressive 51.11% of points. In contrast, Carou has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 45.8%. This particular statistic has proven to be highly correlated with the accuracy of match predictions, allowing us to gauge the players' proficiency.
When delving into the return game stats, Vallejo has exhibited a remarkable ability to capitalize on their opponent's second serve, triumphing in 52.91% of such points. On the other hand, Carou has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 50.83%. In terms of first serve returns, Vallejo has shown a success rate of 37.02% while Carou lags slightly behind at 33.93%. This statistic holds significant weight in determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
An analysis of how the players perform under pressure reveals that Vallejo has successfully saved 58.91% of breakpoints in recent form. Comparatively, Carou has managed to save 55.43% of breakpoints. This statistic serves as a useful tool for in-game betting predictions, offering valuable insights into their ability to navigate critical moments.
Examining the players' overall performance over the last year, Vallejo has enjoyed a higher success rate, winning 53.03% of matches played (W/L 35/31), while Carou has achieved a win rate of 34.48% (W/L 10/19). This overview provides a comprehensive prediction for their head-to-head encounter.
Considering the favored surface for each player, Vallejo has demonstrated their proficiency on Hard court, winning 58% of matches played (W/L 31/22). Conversely, their performance on Indoor Hard court has been less impressive, winning 40% of matches played (W/L 2/3). Carou, on the other hand, excels on Clay court, winning 44% of matches (W/L 133/168), and struggles on Hard court, with a 43% win rate (W/L 26/35).
It is worth noting that Vallejo primarily competes in Challenger/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.08% of matches played (W/L 25/27), while Carou also frequents Challenger/ITF tournaments > $10K, but with a lower success rate of 23.81% (W/L 5/16). Hence, when comparing the players' stats to predict the favorite, it is vital to consider the level of events they have been participating in.
An examination of the opponents faced by both players indicates that over the last 12 months, Vallejo has encountered opponents with an average rank of 239, while Carou has faced players with an average rank of 226.38. These stats shed light on the quality of competition they have faced, providing valuable insights into their overall performance.
In matches that reach a deciding set, Vallejo has showcased their ability to thrive under pressure, winning 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months. In contrast, Carou has achieved a significantly lower success rate of 17% in matches played on the tour. These statistics are particularly crucial for those interested in live predictions and betting, as they forecast the players' performance in determining sets.
While past player performance is undeniably valuable in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider current event stats to gauge who is currently in form. By monitoring the ongoing event and reviewing the section below for player-specific insights, we can ascertain whether certain players have a history of performing exceptionally well at specific events, which should be factored into our outcome predictions.
Furthermore, understanding break point conversion rates is essential for in-game live betting tips. Vallejo has exhibited a conversion rate of 41.64% in recent form, showcasing their ability to seize opportunities when faced with breakpoints. Conversely, Carou has displayed a slightly higher conversion rate, capitalizing on 43.48% of their chances to break their opponents' serve.
If you are interested in exploring models that predict tennis matches, this article provides an excellent starting point. However, it is worth noting that the content caters specifically to the interests of avid stats enthusiasts.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Kilian Feldbausch
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
60%
(
69 of
115)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
109)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
47 of
60)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
38 of
109)
113
Total Points Won
111
|
4-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
F | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
SF | 5-7 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Igor Gimenez
Player
Ignacio Carou
61%
(
51 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-7(7) 6-4 10-7 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jose Pereira
Player
Ignacio Carou
68%
(
58 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
33%
(
28 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ignacio Carou
Player
Dario Acosta
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Renzo Olivo
Player
Ignacio Carou
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Mateo Del Pino
Player
Ignacio Carou
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
100
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ignacio Carou
Player
Nikos Lehmann
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alex Kuperstein
Player
Ignacio Carou
78%
(
68 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
103)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ignacio Carou
Player
Juan Bautista Otegui
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
48%
(
14 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
48%
(
19 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
41
Total Points Won
39
|
6-5 ret. | H2H |
view more