M. Marterer
To Win
A. Walton
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W L W L LForm
L L W W L W L W L LThey have played 4 sets in total, with Walton winning 4 and Shimizu winning 0. The last match between Walton and Shimizu was at the Busan Challenger, 17-04-2025, Round: Second, Surface: Hard, with Adam Walton getting the victory 6-2 7-6(4).
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Adam Walton | 2 |
Yuta Shimizu | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Busan Challenger(17-04-2025)
Walton | Stats | Shimizu |
---|---|---|
63% (25-15) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (8-10) |
2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
91 | Ranking | 192 |
85 | Highest Rank | 181 |
26 | Age | 25 |
- | Plays | L |
9 | Titles | 13 |
64% (193-107) | Career Total W/L | 63% (265-154) |
$401,895 | Career Prize Money | $60,235 |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
- / First
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
French Open - Paris atp
25 May 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 7-6(4) |
![]() ![]()
Adam Walton
Player
Yuta Shimizu
81%
(
50 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
7-6(5) 6-0 |
![]() ![]()
Adam Walton
Player
Yuta Shimizu
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
53
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
4 | Sets Won | 0 |
26 | Games Won | 14 |
11 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
1:46:10 | Average Match Time | 1:46:10 |
73% (89/122) | 1st Serve % | 59% (79/135) |
76% (68/89) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (45/79) |
64% (21/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (30/56) |
43% (6/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 20% (1/5) |
44% (60/135) | Return Points Win % | 27% (33/122) |
100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In the recent six-month span, Adam Walton and Ryo Shimizu have showcased intriguing statistics on their second serve performance. Walton has clinched 46.72% of points when delivering his second serve, just slightly trailing Shimizu, who stands at 47.12%. How does this subtle difference in performance shape the overall match forecast? Historical data indicates a strong correlation between second serve success and match outcome predictions.
What about their return game dynamics? Interestingly, Walton excels in return games, capturing 47.11% of points from his opponent's second serve compared to Shimizu's 46.97%. However, when it comes to returning first serves, Shimizu holds a slight edge with a win rate of 27.37% against Walton’s 23.96%. These numbers could tip the balance in favor of Shimizu in their head-to-head showdown.
Handling pressure on the court is crucial. Walton has managed to save 53.85% of breakpoints he's faced recently. While this is impressive, Shimizu has been slightly more resilient, fending off 55.09% of breakpoints against him, giving him a slight advantage in intense, pressure-laden moments.
Analyzing their overall performance across the past year, Walton emerges with a 59.55% success rate, translating to 53 wins and 36 losses. In contrast, Shimizu has secured victory in 56.72% of his matches (W/L 38/29). This close contest clearly paints a picture of two players with competitive spirits, likely resulting in a thrilling match.
Their career-defining surfaces also offer insight. Walton’s forte lies on hard courts, boasting a winning percentage of 68%. Conversely, clay courts favor Shimizu, where he experiences a 72% success rate. This knowledge is integral when evaluating the favored player based on the surface they are competing on.
How have they fared against each other in head-to-head encounters? Walton and Shimizu have clashed once before, with Walton triumphing. This previous victory might give Walton a psychological edge, especially after winning both sets they played, including a tiebreak. Their prior matches averaged a duration of 1 hour and 45 minutes, often filled with tight games and moments of intense pressure.
Delving into the level of tournaments they've played, Walton has been competing mostly in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 71.43% of his matches, while Shimizu claims 58.46% in similar events. This disparity might be pivotal in determining who is battle-hardened for high-stake matches.
The quality of opponents can reveal much about a player's readiness for tough matches. Walton has faced players averaging a rank of 246.09, slightly above Shimizu’s corresponding opponents with an average rank of 285.39. This subtle difference might grant Walton the competitive edge needed to navigate through crucial moments.
Ultimately, as we scrutinize the arsenal of stats and their implications, Walton seems poised for victory, drawing strength from his previous head-to-head success and superior versatility on hard surfaces. Though both players are closely matched, these elements tilt the odds subtly in Walton's favor.
Walton vs Shimizu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Andre Ilagan
Player
Adam Walton
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
15 of
20)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
48
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Adam Walton
51%
(
60 of
118)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
13
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
6
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
48%
(
28 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
44 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
113
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Adam Walton
Player
Andre Ilagan
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
11
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Adam Walton
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
41%
(
17 of
41)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Adam Walton
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
78%
(
21 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Terence Atmane
Player
Adam Walton
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Adam Walton
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
64%
(
77 of
121)
1st Serve %
64%
(
85 of
133)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
58 of
85)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
40%
(
48 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
57 of
133)
130
Total Points Won
124
|
7-6(6) 6-7(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Adam Walton
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
6
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
51 of
62)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
25%
(
23 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 5-7 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Yuta Shimizu
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Titouan Droguet
Player
Yuta Shimizu
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Benoit Paire
56%
(
5 of
9)
1st Serve %
46%
(
11 of
24)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
25%
(
1 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
21
Total Points Won
12
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Adam Walton
Player
Yuta Shimizu
81%
(
50 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
50%
(
38 of
76)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jelle Sels
Player
Yuta Shimizu
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Maxime Janvier
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
1
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Denis Yevseyev
68%
(
72 of
106)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
99)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
43 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
107
Total Points Won
98
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
64% (193/107) | Win/Loss | 63% (265/154) |
62% (422/264) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (578/382) |
55% (3557/2966) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4837/4173) |
67% (179/87) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (208/119) |
38% (3/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 69% (27/12) |
41% (7/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (26/21) |
44% (4/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) |
0.46 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
1481 | Aces Total | 1034 |
0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
615 | Total Double Faults | 861 |
1:35:23 | Average Match Time | 1:33:20 |
312.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 480.79 |
64% (11735/18453) | 1st Serve % | 62% (16779/27154) |
72% (8482/11735) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (11382/16779) |
53% (3581/6718) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5212/10375) |
43% (805/1888) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1384/3009) |
39% (7619/19310) | Return Points Win % | 42% (11745/27858) |
25% (2/6) | Slam W/L | 20% (1/4) |
56% (9/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) |
44% (12/15) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (2/2) |
63% (92/55) | Challenger W/L | 55% (99/82) |
76% (78/24) | Futures W/L | 71% (162/65) |
65% (189/290) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (251/402) |
17% (1/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (6/6) |
54% (57/105) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (61/114) |
57% (46/81) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (71/128) |
90% (186/167) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (253/222) |
10% (186/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (253/30) |
23% (114/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (166/40) |