A. Walton
To Win
TBD
To Win
Adam Walton vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W W L W L
Form
W L L L W L W W L LHead To Head: Walton 1 - 1 Wong
They have played 5 sets in total, with Walton winning 2 and Wong winning 3. The last match between Walton and Wong was at the Miami Open - Miami, 24-03-2025, Third, Hard with Adam Walton getting the victory 7-6(6) 4-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Adam Walton | 1 |
| Chak Lam Coleman Wong | 1 |
Miami Open - Miami(24-03-2025)
7
6
4
6
6
4
| Walton | Stats | Wong |
|---|---|---|
| 65% (24-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 41% (7-10) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 86 | Ranking | 169 |
| 85 | Highest Rank | 128 |
| 26 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 9 | Titles | 2 |
| 65% (192-105) | Career Total W/L | 56% (139-110) |
| $401,895 | Career Prize Money | $225,210 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
Walton VS TBD
- / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
28 Apr 2025 / First
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Masarova VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Keys VS Vekic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Adam Walton
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Adam Walton
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
11
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 25 | Games Won | 28 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 26 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:47:49 | Average Match Time | 1:47:49 |
| 67% (109/163) | 1st Serve % | 69% (106/154) |
| 70% (76/109) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (78/106) |
| 56% (30/54) | 2nd Serve Win % | 63% (30/48) |
| 60% (3/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (5/10) |
| 30% (46/154) | Return Points Win % | 35% (57/163) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Adam Walton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jason Murray Kubler
Player
Adam Walton
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
41%
(
17 of
41)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
.jpg)
Adam Walton
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
14 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
78%
(
21 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Terence Atmane
Player
Adam Walton
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
64%
(
77 of
121)
1st Serve %
64%
(
85 of
133)
8
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
58 of
85)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
40%
(
48 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
57 of
133)
130
Total Points Won
124
|
7-6(6) 6-7(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
6
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
51 of
62)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
25%
(
23 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
35 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Yuta Shimizu
81%
(
50 of
62)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Rio Noguchi
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Adam Walton
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Michael Mmoh
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
8
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
23%
(
6 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Adam Walton
98%
(
43 of
44)
1st Serve %
100%
(
40 of
40)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
12 of
40)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
45%
(
20 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Chak Lam Coleman Wong Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Cina
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
20 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
70 of
104)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
33 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Ben Shelton
66%
(
71 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
8
Aces
17
0
Double Faults
2
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
38 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
28 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Daniel Altmaier
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
0
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
19%
(
10 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Billy Harris
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
12
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
64%
(
27 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
30 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jenson Brooksby
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Viktor Durasovic
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
50%
(
43 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
10
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Rudolf Molleker
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (192/105) | Win/Loss | 56% (139/110) |
| 62% (419/260) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (311/269) |
| 55% (3525/2930) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (2855/2734) |
| 68% (178/85) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (115/80) |
| 38% (3/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (18/18) |
| 41% (7/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (6/8) |
| 44% (4/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) |
| 0.46 | Aces Per Game | 0.48 |
| 1462 | Aces Total | 1315 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 598 | Total Double Faults | 502 |
| 1:35:19 | Average Match Time | 1:30:16 |
| 311.69 | Average Opponent Rank | 379.8 |
| 64% (11624/18253) | 1st Serve % | 60% (9202/15310) |
| 72% (8402/11624) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (6508/9202) |
| 53% (3537/6629) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2957/6108) |
| 43% (799/1869) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (583/1449) |
| 39% (7538/19084) | Return Points Win % | 39% (5978/15446) |
| 25% (2/6) | Slam W/L | 33% (2/4) |
| 56% (9/7) | Masters W/L | 44% (4/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 63% (5/3) |
| 44% (12/15) | Main Tour W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (91/53) | Challenger W/L | 55% (53/44) |
| 76% (78/24) | Futures W/L | 60% (72/49) |
| 66% (188/287) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (134/244) |
| 17% (1/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 54% (56/103) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (45/82) |
| 57% (46/80) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (46/81) |
| 90% (184/166) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (129/113) |
| 9% (184/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (129/16) |
| 23% (113/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (120/25) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
