Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Adam Pavlasek vs Tim Van Rijthoven Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pavlasek vs Rijthoven analysis and find out who is favored!
Adam Pavlasek vs Tim Van Rijthoven Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pavlasek has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Rijthoven has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pavlasek, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rijthoven has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pavlasek has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rijthoven has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pavlasek has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Rijthoven winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pavlasek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 206/ 132), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 22/ 26). Rijthoven has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 61/ 47).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pavlasek winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Pavlasek winning 1 and Rijthoven winning 2. The last match between Pavlasek and Rijthoven was at the Prague Challenger, 24-07-2018, First, Clay with Tim Van Rijthoven getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:11:2.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pavlasek and Rijthoven have played a deciding set 1 times, with Pavlasek winning 0 times and Rijthoven 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Pavlasek winning 1, and Rijthoven 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pavlasek has played against opponents with an average rank of while Rijthoven has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pavlasek has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rijthoven has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pavlasek has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rijthoven has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pavlasek 0 - 1 Rijthoven
887
Rank
72
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
871
Rank
101
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
59% (294-208)
Career Total W/L
62% (234-141)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$264,170
Career Prize Money
$499,600
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Adam Pavlasek | Tim Van Rijthoven |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 13 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:2 | 2:11:2 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (47/85) | 61% (71/117) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (33/47) | 69% (49/71) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (20/38) | 46% (21/46) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (3/12) | 50% (5/10) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (47/117) | 38% (32/85) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 |
Stats 
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Adam Pavlasek
61%
(
71 of
117)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
85)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
0
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
47 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Adam Pavlasek | Tim Van Rijthoven |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Adam Pavlasek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexandar Lazarov
Player
Adam Pavlasek
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Adam Pavlasek
100%
(
5 of
5)
1st Serve %
60%
(
6 of
10)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
10
Total Points Won
5
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Pavlasek
Player
Artur Kukasian
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Adam Pavlasek
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
8
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Adam Pavlasek
Player
Mark Havlicek
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Pavlasek
Player
Bozo Barun
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sean Cuenin
Player
Adam Pavlasek
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
6
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
8
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Pavlasek
Player
Yann Wojcik
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
4
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
3
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Milos Karol
Player
Adam Pavlasek
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
55
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 3-4 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Tim Van Rijthoven Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
21
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
3
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
42 of
47)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
21 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
22%
(
16 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Alex Molcan
69%
(
73 of
106)
1st Serve %
68%
(
86 of
126)
27
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
61 of
86)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
30 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
47 of
126)
123
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(6) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
48
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
9
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
6
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(7) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Radu Albot
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
14
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
10
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
20 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Viktor Durasovic
75%
(
91 of
121)
1st Serve %
68%
(
88 of
130)
25
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
88)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
40 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
130)
128
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
11
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Pavlasek Vs Rijthoven Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
