Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Adam Hubble vs Tae-Woo Lee Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hubble vs Lee analysis and find out who is favored!
Adam Hubble vs Tae-Woo Lee Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hubble has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Lee has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hubble, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lee has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hubble has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lee has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hubble has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lee winning 71.43% (W/L 5/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hubble has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 36/ 43), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8). Lee has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 25/ 15), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 63/ 43).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hubble has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lee has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hubble has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lee has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hubble has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lee has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hubble 0 - 0 Lee
Ret.
Rank
High
38
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
892
Rank
746
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
42% (54-75)
Career Total W/L
60% (88-58)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Adam Hubble | Tae-Woo Lee |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Adam Hubble Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Adam Hubble
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
76%
(
37 of
49)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adam Hubble
Player
David Barclay
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Adam Hubble
Player
Dayne Kelly
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
56
Total Points Won
54
|
4-6 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Keita Koyama
Player
Adam Hubble
73%
(
83 of
113)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
38%
(
43 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
85)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dane Webb
Player
Adam Hubble
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
2
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Tae-Woo Lee Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Hong Chung
Player
Tae-Woo Lee
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
21 of
39)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tae-Woo Lee
Player
Woodam Song
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tae-Woo Lee
Player
Jaewoo Park
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tae-Woo Lee
Player
Unknown Player
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jun Ha Hyun
Player
Tae-Woo Lee
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tae-Woo Lee
Player
Jungmin Hwang
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Seydina Andre
Player
Tae-Woo Lee
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tae-Woo Lee
Player
Igor Dudun
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 2-6 7-5 10-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Hubble Vs Lee Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
