Abel Forger vs Jack Loge Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L W W L W L L
Form
L W L W W W L W W LHead To Head: Forger 1 - 0 Loge
They have played 2 sets in total, with Forger winning 2 and Loge winning 0. The last match between Forger and Loge was at the M15 Oegstgeest, 29-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Abel Forger getting the victory 6-0 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Abel Forger | 1 |
| Jack Loge | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: M15 Oegstgeest(29-04-2025)
Abel Forger
Jack Loge
6
0
6
1
| Forger | Stats | Loge |
|---|---|---|
| 66% (27-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 61% (27-17) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 743 | Ranking | 685 |
| 743 | Highest Rank | 662 |
| 19 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 56% (55-44) | Career Total W/L | 56% (99-78) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shapovalov VS Walton PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
19 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cerundolo VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Nordea Open - Bastad atp
18 Jul 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-0 6-1 |
Stats 
Abel Forger
Player
Jack Loge
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 1 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:6:43 | Average Match Time | 1:6:43 |
| 65% (26/40) | 1st Serve % | 60% (29/48) |
| 85% (22/26) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (15/29) |
| 50% (7/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 26% (5/19) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 58% (28/48) | Return Points Win % | 28% (11/40) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Forger vs Loge Match Preview :
How do we measure the prowess of Forger and Loge on their second serves? Over the past six months, numbers reveal a slight edge for Forger, as they clinch 44.58% of points from their second serve, compared to Loge's 41.95%. This statistic often serves as a reliable oracle for anticipating match outcomes. But the plot thickens when diving into return games. Forger once again takes a slight lead, winning 46.11% of points from their opponent’s second serve, outpacing Loge's 44.27%. Yet, when turning the lens to first serve returns, the tables turn, with Loge approaching supremacy at 29.75%, overshadowing Forger’s 26.75%.
Navigating the undercurrents of pressure, how do they perform when saving breakpoints? Here, the two make for intriguing study: Loge slightly edges out Forger by saving 50.88% breakpoints against 49.63%. This nuance can be a darling stat for those venturing into in-game betting predictions. But what about their overarching performance across the past year? Forger has clinched 59.32% of their matches, a notch above Loge's 56.9%. The head-to-head duel thus draws closer as we assess their journey through the tennis circuits.
Is there a surface where Forger flourishes most? Their career speaks highly of their prowess on Hard courts, chalking up a 63% win rate. However, Clay seems to be their Achilles' heel, with just 35%. In parallel, Loge also showcases their command on Hard courts with an identical 63% win rate but falters on Indoor Hard, where they grapple with a 33% success rate. Both have carved out significant plays at the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, with Forger winning a slightly more generous 59.32% compared to Loge's 56.9% across the past year. A notable aspect plays out in their opponent profiles: Forger has faced tougher adversaries, with an average rank of 96.39 compared to Loge's encounters with players averaging a rank of 433.81.
In moments of do-or-die, should this match pivot into deciding sets, both players stand equally at 50% success on this frontier. If looking for hints from current matches, Forger and Loge's present form can cast more light, depending on ongoing event stats. Plus, this match-up invites intrigue with breakpoint conversion rates. Loge again shows notable skill, turning 35.37% of opportunities into successful breakpoints, as opposed to Forger’s 29.63%. As the dust settles, and with these threads woven together, a slight edge seems tilted toward Forger, whose marginally superior stats and tougher match history position them as the anticipated one to triumph.
Forger vs Loge Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Abel Forger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Abel Forger
65%
(
80 of
123)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
60 of
80)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
45 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
96)
113
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Abel Forger
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Abel Forger
Player
Benjamin Zuniga Garcia
50%
(
21 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Abel Forger
63%
(
50 of
80)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Abel Forger
Player
Alec Deckers
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
9
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
37 of
45)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Abel Forger
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Theo Papamalamis
Player
Abel Forger
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
76%
(
45 of
59)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Abel Forger
Player
Pieter De Lange
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
52%
(
47 of
90)
1
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
11
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
33 of
47)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jack Loge Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Emilien Demanet
Player
Jack Loge
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
38 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Loge
Player
Gasper Matijasic
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
50
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Loge
Player
Jonathan Mridha
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Michele Ribecai
Player
Jack Loge
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jack Loge
Player
Emilien Demanet
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jack Loge
Player
Dimitris Sakellaridis
72%
(
78 of
108)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
107
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Loge
Player
Gabriele Bosio
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
37 of
77)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Jack Loge
37%
(
22 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (55/44) | Win/Loss | 56% (99/78) |
| 55% (124/103) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (219/189) |
| 54% (1133/977) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (1984/1878) |
| 63% (26/15) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (59/35) |
| 49% (25/26) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (37/37) |
| 57% (4/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (3/6) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 259 | Aces Total | 314 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 376 | Total Double Faults | 449 |
| 1:39:25 | Average Match Time | 1:16:19 |
| 445.02 | Average Opponent Rank | 375.75 |
| 62% (3744/6016) | 1st Serve % | 62% (5688/9212) |
| 67% (2513/3744) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (3633/5688) |
| 46% (1038/2272) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1665/3524) |
| 44% (303/688) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (455/1056) |
| 43% (2562/6006) | Return Points Win % | 42% (3969/9439) |
| 0% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 56% (55/43) | Futures W/L | 56% (99/77) |
| 55% (53/97) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (95/172) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (10/20) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (17/32) |
| 47% (15/32) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (33/57) |
| 87% (54/47) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (92/80) |
| 13% (54/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (92/11) |
| 16% (44/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (85/18) |
Forger vs. Loge Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
