The current Head to Head score is 2-0. Gauff comes into this match with a ranking of 4 , while Paolini is ranked 6.
Gauff vs Paolini Prediction, Tips & Picks Analysis:
Second serve performance analysis: In matches leading up to this game, Paolini has won 44% of points on his second serve, while Gauff has won 42% and in historical match simulations this is a very important variable in analyzing the outcome.
Returning game stats analysis: Leading up to this h2h matchup Paolini has won 31% of his opponent’s first serve points, while Gauff has won 29%. The same stats for second serve return points are 50% and 54% respectively which historical data suggests is very important when picking h2h betting tips.
Performance under pressure prediction: Paolini has been saving 45% of his breakpoints, and Gauff has saved 45% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Surface prediction: Paolini performs best on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 215/124) and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 14/15). Gauff performs best on Grass, winning 71% (W/L 24/10), and performs worse on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 143/62).
In play break point conversion prediction: Jasmine Paolini has converted 33% of breakpoint opportunities in their recent games and Cori Gauff has converted 37% of their chances to get the break which is an important stat in our betting tips system to pick the outcome.
Last match played: In the match before this one, Cori Gauff played Ella Seidel in the Second round at the Porsche Tennis Grand Prix – Stuttgart and won 6-1 6-1 in 00:57:13 . Jasmine Paolini played Jule Niemeier in the Second round at the Porsche Tennis Grand Prix – Stuttgart and won 6-1 7-5 in 01:26:18.
Unlimited match filtering is available on the detailed stats head to head page where you can also see current event performance stats.
Prediction Stats H2H Summary Of Cori Gauff and Jasmine Paolini
Of their last 10 matches played, Gauff has won 5, while Paolini has won 8. The Matchstat.com prediction algorithm uses about 190 variables. One very important stat for this match is on Clay . In recent matches, Gauff has won 45% of her own 2nd serve points and 50% of return points , while Paolini has won 48% of her own 2nd serve points and 50% of return points.
Amanda@MatchStat
See below for our machine learning AI prediction for Gauff Vs Paolini
Career Performance Prediction Factors In Our Pick:
Gauff has won 10 titles in her career, while Jasmine Paolini has won 13 events. Gauff has won 52% (24160 of 46204) of points played in her entire career, and Paolini has achieved 51% (38597 of 76411). A great statistic to predict performance under pressure is that, Gauff has won 62% of tie breaks in his entire career (48 of 77), whereas Jasmine Paolini has won 54% (74 of 137). As per the image above, our algorithm is predicting Cori Gauff has an 64.09% probability of winning this match.
Cori Gauff vs Jasmine Paolini Odds & Betting Tips Our Prediction: Cori Gauff To Get The Win
After analyzing hundreds of performance variables against all other players in their careers and recent form, as well as head to head performance stats, our pick indicates Cori Gauff has a 64.09% chance of winning and Jasmine Paolini has a 35.91% chance of taking the victory. We tip Gauff to get the win. Whether you should place a bet on this pick or not depends on the likely probability of the player winning relative to the odds
To see all live tennis scores for the Porsche Tennis Grand Prix – Stuttgart, go here.
Rushit is an enthusiastic and skilled sports analyst known for his keen insights and accurate predictions across a variety of sports. With a background in data analytics, Rushit combines his love for sports with a methodical approach to statistics, offering a fresh perspective on game outcomes, player performances, and season trends.
His work is characterized by a deep understanding of statistical models, a passion for uncovering hidden patterns, and an ability to communicate complex analysis in an accessible and engaging way.
He is particularly known for his tennis head to head predictions, which have proven remarkably accurate over the years.
